You need a translation of Kemell's goal-scoring video text?translation?
Why be rude about it?You need a translation of Kemell's goal-scoring video text?
First one:
"Finland gains the 1-0 lead! Kemell's pass attempt ricochets off a Latvian defender into the net, we'll take it!"
Second one:
"And Kemell again! Kemell gets a 2-on-1 attack with Hirvonen and the JYP forward makes no mistake!"
Isn't it very revolutionary?
Because they're just goal-scoring videos where the text is completely irrelevant, and if you really wanted to know you could just google translate.Why be rude about it?
So that's a reason to be rude?Because they're just goal-scoring videos where the text is completely irrelevant, and if you really wanted to know you could just google translate.
Yeah maybe.This kid will make a bunch of teams look foolish. I had him ranked 3rd OV on my list.
This kid will make a bunch of teams look foolish. I had him ranked 3rd OV on my list.
I'm not sure that's an entirely fair assessment, he's been playing for a terrible team with his linemates like Kalapudas not known for their scoring ability.He will score some goals, but his IQ will prevent him from becoming a top tier offensive threat imo. He seems very much so like a gifted goal scorer who could score 30 goals but put up 10 assists in a season.
I agree with what was said on the previous page by someone in this thread, about how it's not surprising at all that he fell in the draft. His lack of IQ/playmaking ability will limit him
His IQ is quite fine and he can setup plays, processes the game well and quickly with the puck on his stick, he is not just an unidimentional goalscorer. Kemell was the Caufield of the last draft, the way he distributes pucks is a pretty underrated part of his game.He will score some goals, but his IQ will prevent him from becoming a top tier offensive threat imo. He seems very much so like a gifted goal scorer who could score 30 goals but put up 10 assists in a season.
I agree with what was said on the previous page by someone in this thread, about how it's not surprising at all that he fell in the draft. His lack of IQ/playmaking ability will limit him
Lekkerimäki should have gone earlier, really liked his game when i watched him at the u18's, more dynamic then Kemell and skates better.Slafkovský was the only pure winger that went higher. I'd say it was rather his position, size, and injuries that kept Kemell at 17th. Ahead of him you could say Geekie is just a big frame and Lekkerimäki a fast-skating shot. Gauthier a combination of the two and he went 5th.
Why did Lundell go at #12? Why did Sebastian Aho get drafted at #35? Kakko 2nd, Kotkaniemi 3rd, Pulju 4th? Why did Caufield fall to #15 despite having an extremely impressive resume? Could it be that NHL teams aren't very good at drafting, even when your personal opinion lines up with their pick? Like, if there's a reason Kemell fell in the draft, then what's the reason Lekkerimäki fell in the draft?Kemell is a very north south attacker, i have never seen him make any plays that made me think wow this kid is a great playmaker, he knows how to shoot and finish, that's what he's known to be good at, skating is pretty good but everything else is average. There is a reason he fell the way he fell in the draft.
Lol there’s always someone.Didn’t impress me against Latvia.
Four points and nine shot attempts in under 15 minutes. What a scrubDidn’t impress me against Latvia.
this the Mf that posts in every Kemmell thread abt how mid he is … he tryna cope so hard but Kemmell living rent free in his headDidn’t impress me against Latvia.
A bunch of teams will look foolish, especially Buffalo who passed on this kid twice.