Bottomshelf
Registered User
- Sep 16, 2019
- 103
- 114
If I’m trailing in a game I want Michkov. If I’m leading I want Demidov. Tied? Dealers choice, Michkov if you want a higher chance to score. Demidov if you want a more protective approach
We could pf had both...then we can trail and lead at the same time.If I’m trailing in a game I want Michkov. If I’m leading I want Demidov. Tied? Dealers choice, Michkov if you want a higher chance to score. Demidov if you want a more protective approach
we can ask them to take a test to see who wins then.Demidov is not smarter than Michkov
we can ask them to take a test to see who wins then.
This relies on the notion that the Habs passed on Michkov knowing they'd get Demidov. They didn't.We could pf had both...then we can trail and lead at the same time.
Yes, the thought of both is too brain wrecking...
Joking aside, has anybody consideted that both guys on the same team could lead into conflict? It's not the first time cliques have formed around players.
I'm not saying it will, but it can happen.
Even to suggest that the Habs passed on Michkov because they knew they were getting Demidov is up there with Santa and Easter Bunny.This relies on the notion that the Habs passed on Michkov knowing they'd get Demidov. They didn't.
They passed on Michkov for reasons that we will most likely never know, but it wasn't because of Demidov.
If it was Bergevin we probably would of whiffed on both to draft tall centers who "need some time to develop" instead, so at least the glass is half full with Demigod in the pipeline.Even to suggest that the Habs passed on Michkov because they knew they were getting Demidov is up there with Santa and Easter Bunny.
ONLY way that was possible was to lose enough games to pick second. No way that was going to happen because they would have to deliberatly lose games and it would show.
The BPA at 5th was Michkov by a mile and Hughes went on need. Stupid move and first mistake.
Hopefully, his last major mistake.