Kane and Kucherov are similar players mostly in the few flaws they share.
I don't see that, you're more so describing Michkov. Unless you think Demidov's two-way involvement somehow shrinks from making the NHL. Now, what I mean is: yes, Demidov will be great. But Celebrini, by all accounts thus far looks like he will be better and more valuable as an NHL prospect, including position, even his nationality, language etc, like it or not. Celebrini has already proven in both NCAA and national junior stage he can elevate his play.
Biggest knock on Demidov obviously is: he needed better competition this year after already performing in MHL last year, why didn't he have any?
No, there isn't. Yes, it is.