He’s scoring a lot with limited ice timeWhat do you mean by /60?
4.0 p/60 would average over 2 ppg for a player playing 22min/game
Is it linear? No
He’s scoring a lot with limited ice timeWhat do you mean by /60?
Per 60 minutes playedWhat do you mean by /60?
It's obviously not linear but In Demidov's case more icetime does correlate to a big boost in production.He’s scoring a lot with limited ice time
4.0 p/60 would average over 2 ppg for a player playing 22min/game
Is it linear? No
We will never know, will we? Other factors could come into play such as fatigue, possible injuries, etc.It's obviously not linear but In Demidov's case more icetime does correlate to a big boost in production.
1 point 9 games with less than 9 mins (played under 5 mins for most of these)
36 points in 34 games with more than 9 minutes
23 points in 13 games with more than 15 minutes
So it's probably safe to say he could have a lot more points if he played good minutes and pp all season
You're right, in the grand scheme of things it's not really about the numbers. I've watched around 10 full games from him this season and I've been impressed each time. His overall game is so good, his edges, compete level, outrageous skill, the superstar aura, it's all there.We will never know, will we? Other factors could come into play such as fatigue, possible injuries, etc.
Which is what his post was about.
Just really even if he had less points is not about that, look at the big picture. Proving every day a little bit more that he has that something to become a dominant NHL player. I thought Michkov was better from the very start but after what I've seen from Ivan this year... I think it's debatable
Points per 60 minutes. His is outrageousWhat do you mean by /60?