I would blame on the player's poor intellect. I hope he is smarter than that. "Oh, but I am entitled to play X minutes, coach! I am a future star, coach!"You can say that, but do you think he’s happy to play 45 seconds per game? He must be frustrated. Nobody wants to train every day but not play in games. If he’s a top 10 pick, which I’m sure he will be, that heightens the situation. His future is going to be in the NHL, and I don’t think anyones going to be satisfied with another season of barely playing. Teams and players are now more willing to have the player leave early. I don’t think that’d be good, so I hope he starts getting more regular minutes, but Yurov may ask for a contract termination for next season and I don’t think Magnitka is going to stand in the way of a guy they barely use. Don’t be surprised and blame it all on the player if Yurov is playing AHL next season.
I don't think what Kostin has now can be called a success. And Guryanov is also not the greatest 12OA all-time either so far.Those are examples, Yurov is supposed to be top 5 with a higher potential than both Guryanov and Kostin. I'm saying it may not be the most ideal but he can still succeed with that path.
Floor: GuryanovComparable for Yurov?
Buchnevich was a PPG player in the MHL and got 2 points in 12 KHL games. With Severstal that was somewhere around the bottom half of the standings. MMG is the best team in the KHL right now.He's 18 without 15 days. Look at where Buchnevich was at his age, and you don't think Buchnevich was that talented...
That's where you are wrong because you don't underatnd how different development systems work. That is indeed tragic.
Comparable for Yurov?
He is a winger and it will obviously be a factor at draft day. My understanding is that Savoie did not get the WJC invite. I really wanted to see them all in the same tournament. But that is the tier I want to compare him to. Wright, Savoie select few who are projected to go in the Top5.
There are still people that think only playing games is development. Okay... Only a lot of coaches say that a lot of junior leagues' problem nowadays is they are playing too many gmes instead of practicing and working on their skills.What? How is barely playing in real game situations good for development?
I’m criticizing Magnitogorsk’s handling of Yurov, not the Russian player development system which I think is one of the best in the world.
As I wrote I don't really care about where he will be picked. One can just hope he doesn't end up with a bad org.I can see the talent level being up there with them but if he's not at center it will hurt his draft position.
I would still be interested in seeing him at center. He plays like Kuznetsov to my eye.
Panarin is a bad example. He already had a near PPG season with Vityaz. He already proved his quality before SKA.
Look, there are exceptions, I admit, but generally I feel that mid-to-lower-table KHL teams offer a better opportunity for young players to develop. There is a bigger margin for error there, young players won't get relagated to 4th line or to the press box after a bad stretch of games. There isn't this huge pressure to always be perfect.
To this day I maintain, and I know that some of you guys will disagree, the worst decision Maxim Chudinov ever made was leave Severstal for SKA. Look at the year he had in 11-12. 35 points in 52 games. Was he too aggressive? Yes. Was he making mistakes? Yes. But, he was learning and developing. He goes to SKA and they put shackles on him, make him into a conservative defensive guy. And thats what he became, a conservative defensive KHL defender.
Good post, IMO. I quoted it in Yurov's thread because I want to get your take on Yurov's situation.
What a terrible take. Yak's main issue was his low hockey IQ. From all the reports I read on Yurov, his hockey sense is high end.Yakupov
Is he more of a two way guy or more a high skilled offensive guy, I wonder how compatible he could be with a line of
Formenton-Stutzle-Yurov.
ThxWhat a terrible take. Yak's main issue was his low hockey IQ. From all the reports I read on Yurov, his hockey sense is high end.
Seriously though, Yakupov makes 0 sense as a comparable.