This appeal to authority fallacy means nothing. Multimillion dollar organizations make wrong decisions every single day, even when they are equipped with lots of information. Hockey GMs know more about hockey and prospects than we do. Yet a hockey GM thought it was a good idea to trade a 1st rd pick for Griffin Reinhart instead of selecting Matt Barzal. A multimillion dollar organization with pro scouting, coaches and personnel watching games and practices decided that Martin St Louis wasn't an NHL player and waived him. Same with Carter Verhaeghe. A team traded Dominik Hasek for Stephane Beauregard and future considerations.
Either the Columbus Blue Jackets made a good pick or a bad pick and it's too early to know which. But the idea that it MUST'VE been ok because their doctors wouldn't have allowed them to pick a guy unless they were 100% sure he would be healthy is just a fallacy. Teams trade for, draft and sign guys with injuries all the time and have it blow up in their face (or work out). All those teams have doctors. Yet mistakes happen.
If you have any other reasons to believe it was a good decision, post them. But if you don't, just saying that doctors must be right is silly. Because I don't think those doctors said he still wouldn't be playing or practicing hockey at this point. So they were wrong about that. It's possible that they were wrong about more than that. I like him and hope for the best, but this is not what the team thought was going to happen when they made the pick. Period.