F Cayden Lindstrom - Medicine Hat Tigers, WHL (2024, 4th, CBJ)

Monk

Registered User
Feb 5, 2008
7,569
5,483
That's a fair point. They know more about the injury than the general public, and have a better idea of future risks and healing timeline. That said, it is still possible they took on more risk than most would stomach.

Since you asked, I informed my risk with the knowledge of what early injuries have done to players before, the delay that large amounts of missed development time cause, and the specific skill levels of the other options available. I am not an expert on the human body, nor am I an NHL decision maker, so I did not need to go farther than this very basic analysis to make my personal rankings which were shared only for my benefit and the enjoyment of HF Wild. Had I known more I may have raised Lindstrom up in my rankings or, conversely, moved him down even further.

I really like Lindstrom, and I thought he was one of the most intriguing prospects with his size, speed, strength, puck skill, and shot. I would have had him somewhere around 3-6th overall on my list if not for the injury. I don't think dropping him ~5 spots is unreasonably low.

"just because something works later out doesn't mean it wasn't too big of a risk to take at the time"

Just seems a little weird to me that you might assume the CBJ did the wrong thing (ie too much risk) even if it works out for them in the end, while not actually knowing how much risk they knew/believed to be taking on.

I understand your logic as it pertains to what you, not an NHL decision maker, would do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BagHead

BagHead

Registered User
Dec 23, 2010
7,138
3,999
Minneapolis, MN
"just because something works later out doesn't mean it wasn't too big of a risk to take at the time"

Just seems a little weird to me that you might assume the CBJ did the wrong thing (ie too much risk) even if it works out for them in the end, while not actually knowing how much risk they knew/believed to be taking on.

I understand your logic as it pertains to what you, not an NHL decision maker, would do.
As I mentioned before, just because they have more information than I do does not mean they didn't take too large of a risk; they may have not, or they may have taken an even larger risk than I know. Currently, it appears too large of a risk to me because I have the information I have. It's not an assumption they did the wrong thing, it's a judgement based off imperfect knowledge. If they share their information with me (doubtful) then I may change my mind. But if I am in the business of judging, and in this case I am, I cannot reserve judgement until I have perfect knowledge, or I will never judge at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hockeyville USA

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Croatia vs Portugal
    Croatia vs Portugal
    Wagers: 5
    Staked: $205.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Wagers: 7
    Staked: $52,190.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Poland vs Scotland
    Poland vs Scotland
    Wagers: 4
    Staked: $185.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Serbia vs Denmark
    Serbia vs Denmark
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $155.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • NHL GRAND SALAMI - 11/18 - 6 GAMES
    NHL GRAND SALAMI - 11/18 - 6 GAMES
    Wagers: 6
    Staked: $1,692.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad