Frk It
Mo Seider Less Problems
- Jul 27, 2010
- 37,006
- 16,004
Have not seen enough of him play to have a strong opinion, but the divisiveness of opinion him and his size feels reminiscent of Rasmussen in his draft year.
I disagree. I think he has highly translatable offense and will be taken very early. Top 10-15, at least.If he’s a first rounder, it’s a late first. He doesn’t have enough offense to be top six.
I think maybe something like a Crouse mixed with a PLD.Hockey sense isn’t something that you can “learn” it’s something that is instinctual, not something you can develop. Lawson Crouse is the ceiling of this player.
He’s big, strong, skates well, and has some puck skills, but playmaking isn’t strong and he can’t really drive a line. Not sure his shot is exactly anything special either.I disagree. I think he has highly translatable offense and will be taken very early. Top 10-15, at least.
Everyone wants a big angry bull who can take the inside, protect the puck, drive to the net and finish.He’s big, strong, skates well, and has some puck skills, but playmaking isn’t strong and he can’t really drive a line. Not sure his shot is exactly anything special either.
I don’t see more than 35 point potential. He has a role in the NHL, but if you are drafting him top 10-15, I’d be disappointed. You’d want a player with top six upside.
Rasmussen was far weaker offensively speaking though. There were legitimate concerns about his offensive potential.Have not seen enough of him play to have a strong opinion, but the divisiveness of opinion him and his size feels reminiscent of Rasmussen in his draft year.
I have seen plenty of people question Lindstrom’s IQ and offensive ability in the last few pages of this thread.Rasmussen was far weaker offensively speaking though. There were legitimate concerns about his offensive potential.
just like the aforementioned Conor Geekie and Cole Sillinger. Although Sillinger couldn’t skate for shit.Players such as him will always get a bit overdrafted due to the unicornness of big guys that can skate.
all 3 of those have really high hockey IQs though Lindstrom has none. I think anyone who drafts him in the 1st is going to regret it let alone near 10, his upside is kinda of a Max Jones. I'd take his teammate Basha over him very easily, Basha has a high IQ.We saw Sillinger go 12th, Geekie 11th and Danielson 9th in the last three drafts. I think it’s reasonable to think it’s possible we see Lindstrom go in that range.
EliteProspects ranked him 4th!!!all 3 of those have really high hockey IQs though Lindstrom has none. I think anyone who drafts him in the 1st is going to regret it let alone near 10, his upside is kinda of a Max Jones. I'd take his teammate Basha over him very easily, Basha has a high IQ.
Lindstrom's ranking is based on whether you think 6'5 is his height or 6'3
BlasphemousMy Lindstrom ranking will be based on whether or not I think he's a good hockey player.