BKarchitect
Registered User
Would Cristall have benefited from the AHL allowing 19 year-old North American players and being able to play high pro level hockey and going through whatever growing pains he’s gonna have versus completely dominating at the junior level? Was thinking about that with Cal Ritchie as well, who was sent down and instantly at 2 PPG in the OHL in the blink of an eye after looking NHL competitive but just a hair off from being truly NHL ready.
I’m not so much wanting to get into a philosophical debate as to why or why not the AHL should allow all 19 year-olds - more just wondering if in Cristal’s specific case and that were an option, how would people feel about the pros and cons of each path?
I’m not so much wanting to get into a philosophical debate as to why or why not the AHL should allow all 19 year-olds - more just wondering if in Cristal’s specific case and that were an option, how would people feel about the pros and cons of each path?