If talking about TV markets, then it’s Toronto hands down.
Canadas TV numbers are better than US numbers, with a much smaller population.
But no new tvs, just leafs territory.
If talking about TV markets, then it’s Toronto hands down.
Canadas TV numbers are better than US numbers, with a much smaller population.
That's the thing about the Houston obsession. Doesn't Dallas already broadcast there? If you like hockey watch the Stars...how many new fans are you creating? And the new $1 billion franchise price, if Fertitta was trying to lowball the NHL to get in, well the bar is set higher. I think you could maybe get someone to shell a $1 billion in the ATL, because that's the southern hub for Corporate America. And you have the whole state of Georgia to win over. Probably get that out of Hamilton too.But no new tvs, just leafs territory.
It's not about splitting existing fan bases to generate more total money. It's about tapping into markets to create new fans.That's the thing about the Houston obsession. Doesn't Dallas already broadcast there? If you like hockey watch the Stars...how many new fans are you creating? And the new $1 billion franchise price, if Fertitta was trying to lowball the NHL to get in, well the bar is set higher. I think you could maybe get someone to shell a $1 billion in the ATL, because that's the southern hub for Corporate America. And you have the whole state of Georgia to win over. Probably get that out of Hamilton too.
Note how Hamilton keeps creeping up the list with every post too.That dude posts the same bait in every thread. He’s not interested in a discussion, just trolling Atlanta.
Austin would definitely support NHL hockey. They have a metro population of 2.4 million with virtually no pro sports teams.That is interesting, wonder if it has do with a bunch of snowbirds in SA? NHL needs corporate dollars locally, not sure if the Austin crowd would spend their entertainment dollars on Hockey season tickets. More of an Arts and Culture crowd from my experience.
That's the thing about the Houston obsession. Doesn't Dallas already broadcast there? If you like hockey watch the Stars...how many new fans are you creating?
I understand that, like Montreal/Quebec, Toronto/Hamilton. I guess Houston is new hockey fans though... But i get it. Definitely has corporate potential. Personally i think Houston is the safety valve if Winnipeg relocates.Houston and Dallas are rival cities and wouldn’t give each other the time of day. They’re also about the same distance apart as Ottawa and Toronto.
Hamilton & Quebec City are about the same size population but what makes it bigger & more lucrative is that Hamilton is a part of the GTHA & being the gateway to southwestern Ontario with a total population combined 6 - 10 million people plus there are more billionaires & billion dollar companies in southern Ontario than any where else in the country not to mention there are billion dollar companies that are involved in the renovation of FirstOntario center .
Quebec City just dose not have the big out areas to draw from to make it a big market team & it will always be considered a small market .
Winnipeg is not going to relocate anytime soon.I understand that, like Montreal/Quebec, Toronto/Hamilton. I guess Houston is new hockey fans though... But i get it. Definitely has corporate potential. Personally i think Houston is the safety valve if Winnipeg relocates.
That's the thing about the Houston obsession. Doesn't Dallas already broadcast there? If you like hockey watch the Stars...how many new fans are you creating?
And the new $1 billion franchise price, if Fertitta was trying to lowball the NHL to get in, well the bar is set higher.
Houston is a bigger city than Atlanta. Additionally, if one were to slice a line between Dallas and Houston, and divide the state in half, both areas would still easily be more populated than Georgia. The metro area has about 7.5 million people.I think you could maybe get someone to shell a $1 billion in the ATL, because that's the southern hub for Corporate America. And you have the whole state of Georgia to win over.
That's the thing about the Houston obsession. Doesn't Dallas already broadcast there? If you like hockey watch the Stars...how many new fans are you creating? And the new $1 billion franchise price, if Fertitta was trying to lowball the NHL to get in, well the bar is set higher. I think you could maybe get someone to shell a $1 billion in the ATL, because that's the southern hub for Corporate America. And you have the whole state of Georgia to win over. Probably get that out of Hamilton too.
The Leafs (and Sabres) probably wouldn't like another team nearby, but it's not up to them. They can't really 'block' another team if the rest of the owners around the league truly believe an additional team there would be good business. They don't require unanimous approval.Whether you have media market coverage is determined by whether there’s a team in that area, not if you broadcast there. The NHL is currently missing 2 of the top 7 media markets in the US. Should be obvious why they want to fill those holes.
I think GTA2 will happen eventually but with the leafs standing in the way, I expect other low hanging fruit will get done first.
The Longhorns have a following that rivals pro teams. They have the lion's share of the Austin's sports market. Yes, there isn't much competition from from the other big 4 leagues but majority of corporate dollars are already going to the longhorns which they would need to eat into.Austin would definitely support NHL hockey. They have a metro population of 2.4 million with virtually no pro sports teams.
The Leafs (and Sabres) probably wouldn't like another team nearby, but it's not up to them. They can't really 'block' another team if the rest of the owners around the league truly believe an additional team there would be good business. They don't require unanimous approval.
Toronto, Boston, Chicago, and Minneapolis/St. Paul could each reasonably have a second NHL team. I'd rather go to growth markets and get new fans, but if the NHL suddenly got interested in a second team somewhere, that would also make sense.
The Leafs (and Sabres) probably wouldn't like another team nearby, but it's not up to them. They can't really 'block' another team if the rest of the owners around the league truly believe an additional team there would be good business. They don't require unanimous approval.
A second team in Boston, Chicago, or Minneapolis would definitely fail.Toronto, Boston, Chicago, and Minneapolis/St. Paul could each reasonably have a second NHL team. I'd rather go to growth markets and get new fans, but if the NHL suddenly got interested in a second team somewhere, that would also make sense.
I understand that, like Montreal/Quebec, Toronto/Hamilton. I guess Houston is new hockey fans though... But i get it. Definitely has corporate potential. Personally i think Houston is the safety valve if Winnipeg relocates.
Buffalo's health with another GTA team is definitely a good question. The smallest US market in the league, and Buffalo is the home of only one Fortune 500 HQ.The Leafs definitely have clout over if Hamilton get an NHL team or not, especially since Hamilton is within what is considered Leafs territory. To a lesser the extent, the Sabres don't want Hamilton, considering Buffalo is a small market team and has considerable ticket base across the border, which would likely evaporate if Hamilton is granted a franchise.
A second team in Boston, Chicago, or Minneapolis would definitely fail.
Most markets have major college presence either in or within 40 minutes of the city center in addition to pro teams. Austin would be a great market to put a pro team in.The Longhorns have a following that rivals pro teams. They have the lion's share of the Austin's sports market. Yes, there isn't much competition from from the other big 4 leagues but majority of corporate dollars are already going to the longhorns which they would need to eat into.
The Longhorns have a following that rivals pro teams. They have the lion's share of the Austin's sports market. Yes, there isn't much competition from from the other big 4 leagues but majority of corporate dollars are already going to the longhorns which they would need to eat into.
I would have to disagree that two teams in Chicago, Minneapolis, and Boston would be feasible. For one thing, Chicago was not big enough to support two NFL teams, so the Cardinals ended up leaving for St.Louis, and then Arizona. Chicago does have two baseball teams, but the Cubs are the big players in town, and the White Sox are relegated to a second class teamAdditional teams in Toronto, Boston, Chicago, and Minneapolis would end up like the NY Mets, being overshadowed by their bigger brother, but those cities have enough population and potential corporate support.