Karlsson made some mistakes against Finland, borderline 2nd D.
He could bring more offense, but on a team like this and with the linemates he has, his playstyle is incredibly valuable though. His board work and breakout passes have been great.
He did play like an OHL:er in that game, to be fair.![]()
Nick Kypreos calling Team Europe having rich history and expecting them to show emotions and really care .Look when you're building wierd teams All-Star teams like this you're not getting anything but maybe some nice hockey.
Glad you noticed. We've been saying it for a long time, Nuge is a good two way player.
Canada and USA will be able to handle the NA speed, and they might eat them alive physically and in the NA zone.
At least the other D are out of position because they are try to create offense. Trouba will be out of position just to lay a hit.
Eichel is better than Larkin? why would Larkin play higher than him in the lineup.
Yikes. Eichel is an elite level player. Probably ends up being the 2nd or 3rd best on this team when their careers are all said and done
I'd like to hear your reasoning
McDavid-Scheifele please.
Entire Team NA D credited with 2 hits so far. Trouba had 4 hits in game 1. I don't care so much about hits as a stat, but Team NA will get steamrolled in their own end by bigger and better teams than Europe if they don't play more physically in their own end. I love the pace and skill of Team NA, but you can't play like ringette in your own zone.
My thoughts as well. NA offense is not going to be able to work over the D of Canada and US like this, let alone get goals against Quick or Price (or whoever they use) like some of the ones Griess was letting in. And too much talent up front on US and Canada for NA to try to play this aggressively. Have no idea how NA will respond when faced with the physicality seen in the US-Canada games.
I'm really excited to see how it plays out.
I thought trouba was good in the 1st game, but he took defensive role so he was boring which here means bad.
Looking at this game he should be on the lineup, he's one of the few who will also add physicality into the lineup that's needed against some of the top teams.
Pretty much. When you think about the current top NHL D for the most part they didn't hit elite status until they were older than this team allows. All of these defensemen have bright futures ahead of them but they aren't going to be equal to Doughty/Karlsson/Hedman/etc in this tournament
Glad you noticed. We've been saying it for a long time, Nuge is a good two way player.
My thoughts as well. NA offense is not going to be able to work over the D of Canada and US like this, let alone get goals against Quick or Price (or whoever they use) like some of the ones Griess was letting in. And too much talent up front on US and Canada for NA to try to play this aggressively. Have no idea how NA will respond when faced with the physicality seen in the US-Canada games.
I'm really excited to see how it plays out.
This. It's something they need to look into quickly. Heck Cze isn't the best team in the tournament but they are a tough team who doesn't hesitate to step up and fight and play physical (as shown in the two games against Rus).
Similar to the rielly and ekblad line it has a good mix of talentThe Ghost-Parayko pairing is living up to my expectations. Ghost is so quick and shifty and Parayko is so fast and solid. They complement each other well.