Free? God no, at least not until Pearson and Poolman are on the LTIR once again. We can't take that cap hit on, for free. We need a 3C, assuming we strike out with College FAs and UFAs, and Kuznetsov is wholly overqualified for that role. As such, we can't afford the cost for who is going to be valued as a top six C for a 3C role.
2013 9 points in 17 games, 2014 37 points in 80 games, 2015 77 points in 82 games, 2016 59 points in 82 games, 2017 83 points in 79 games, 2018 72 points in 76 games, 2019 52 points in 63 games, 2020 29 points in 41 games, 2021 78 points in 79 games, 2022 53 points in 73 games so far. If we're looking at the maximum expected point totals with a new team, he has 4 seasons of 9 that he flirted with a PPG. 3 of his last 4 seasons have been at a 60 ish point pace though, and while I'm not ready to say Kuznetsov is taking an easy ride down the back side of his career, it's not like we can realistically be asked to pay for a point per game player either, and at his cap hit his value isn't strong.
Getting Kuznetsov would necessitate changes to our top six, and in all fairness we could use a play maker. Kuz N playing C with Pettersson and Kuz M on the wing, or Kuz N playing wing with Miller would be how I see that happening, or otherwise stacking center with Pettersson-Miller-Kuznetsov all playing 18 minutes a night. We can use him as another weapon on our PK too, as he gets a few chances a game there when I've seen him play.
Here's the hard part to swallow though: We need to move a big contract to accommodate him and his salary. The Capitals have a few holes on their left side for D. I propose OEL be included as a part of the package, if for no other reason then to offset salary and cap. Rathbone, Hoglander, a conditional 1st, Klimovich...we have pieces to fill out the value, but OEL is really the only player that would make sense for us to move with that kind of cap hit. Miller? Why, they're the same age, Miller plays a more valuable (ie physical) game for us and produces more. Petterrsson? Yeah, right. Boeser? Maybe, but the idea was to move him out for space and cap space, not another 2+ high cap contract. Garland? We'd need to add more to it, and then we have the same problem as Boeser where we're just moving the logjam up higher on our depth chart. Myers? He expire next offseason. Beau or Mikheyev? Neither are screaming for an upgrade and it would take close to both to make room for Kuznetsov and a replacement for the second player.
Now why am I hijacking a thread for a player we don't have room for? Easy, I'm trying to figure out why so many other sites have a number of Kuznetsov to Vancouver proposals on them when there is one possible scenario that makes any sense on our end, which makes no sense on the Capitals end. Did Friedman or someone say something completely, bafflingly stupid last night?