Fatass
Registered User
- Apr 17, 2017
- 24,398
- 16,123
And JR was “born yesterday”?Miller, Hoglander, Willander
Schneider, Zib (40% retained), 2nd rnd 2025
And JR was “born yesterday”?Miller, Hoglander, Willander
Schneider, Zib (40% retained), 2nd rnd 2025
There hasnt been a player like Pettersson available in a long time (if he is available).
26 YO in his prime guaranteed for the next 8 years. If he was playing at his top shape, he obviously wouldnt be available.
I think the most recent comparison is Jack Eichel, but even Eichel wasnt on Peteys level when he was traded. Also Eichel had major injury concerns with his spine.
BUF received
Tuch
Krebs
1st
2nd
If Petey were to be traded, i could see a similar package except a bit more.
Young top 6 player (preferably center or D)
Top prospect (at the time of the trade Krebs was Vegas's top prospect)
Mid 1st
2nd
Its either that, or a top player in a 1 for 1 trade.
At the end of the day, we are talking about a career PPG player with 400+ GP. Hes gonna command a lot.
Sure and then after let’s fly to space and drink slurpees….Miller, Hoglander, Willander
Schneider, Zib (40% retained), 2nd rnd 2025
Nashville is better off trying to make an offer for Miller.To Nash: Pettersson
To Vancouver: Colton Sissons, TBL 2024 1st, VGK 2024 1st, Tommy novak, Luke Evangelista, Matthew Wood
Or Brock NelsonNashville is better off trying to make an offer for Miller.
The idea of an EP deal around McTavish + young D is certainly intriguing, if ANA is willing to go for that. They also have an immense amount of cap space, while McTavish and their young D are on ELCs (the former's expires this year, but he should be cheap to retain on a bridge deal).Demko's injury history doesn't change the fact that the teams best chance at winning is with him in net on his current deal. When his deal ends we'll likely be in a lot of trouble. Doesn't negate his unreliability but Lankinen while he's played admirably isn't taking this team anywhere in the playoffs. There is a reason he is a career backup.
The McTavish ++ deal certainly piques my interest where basically every other Petey proposal hasn't. Mctavish kinda projects as a 2c though so youre trading a young 1c for a 2c sure you get the cap space but there aren't any truly obv UFAs to target. McTavish + Mintyukov is one of the few proposals where I would actually give it some thought. Trading Petey for two young players with the potential to pop isn't the worst idea though. Of course it would mean mailing in this season which is difficult to accept for any ownership let alone the Aquillini's.
Out of curiosity, what happened to Zegras? Kid looked like he would become a ppg after his first 2 full seasons.The idea of an EP deal around McTavish + young D is certainly intriguing, if ANA is willing to go for that. They also have an immense amount of cap space, while McTavish and their young D are on ELCs (the former's expires this year, but he should be cheap to retain on a bridge deal).
That cap space VAN would get through this deal wouldn't have to be used on UFAs, it could be used to drastically lessen the acquisition cost on a contributing piece from a team that is tight to the cap. Of course, the cap is going up, so fewer teams will be facing these problems, but there is a decent chance VAN could leverage something good with that space. Say, a W. Karlsson, Cirelli, Siegenthaler, Whitecloud type, for very minimal cost.
Maybe something like EP for McTavish, Mintyukov, '27 2nd (they have 2) or top-10 protected 2026 1st, then in the offseason, something like 2nd + Aman for W. Karlsson?
It's certainly an option if we wanna overhaul. It is funny though that fans hate Petey and complain about him and then want to go big on Marner. Marner at 13-14 mil for 7 yrs is gonna be tough to swallow for long stretches.And in our case id hope we'd get actual value back not Sturm, Primeau and Stuart
So an actual haul for Petey, then sign one of those two top UFAs yes.
Your math is correct and I dont mind it one bit. 17.5 for three roster players in return for one at 11.6.
So for 6 million of our own capspace we swap Petey for Rantanen or Marner and fill two other important roster spots with TOP young talent.
Yeah I like that approach.
Out of curiosity, what happened to Zegras? Kid looked like he would become a ppg after his first 2 full seasons.
Yup. I don't think there would be much of an add if it were McTavish and Mintyukov, maybe a 2nd. I couldn't see it being a first. And might not really be anything more, not sure. I have heard positive response from Anaheim fans with regards to it though.The idea of an EP deal around McTavish + young D is certainly intriguing, if ANA is willing to go for that. They also have an immense amount of cap space, while McTavish and their young D are on ELCs (the former's expires this year, but he should be cheap to retain on a bridge deal).
That cap space VAN would get through this deal wouldn't have to be used on UFAs, it could be used to drastically lessen the acquisition cost on a contributing piece from a team that is tight to the cap. Of course, the cap is going up, so fewer teams will be facing these problems, but there is a decent chance VAN could leverage something good with that space. Say, a W. Karlsson, Cirelli, Siegenthaler, Whitecloud type, for very minimal cost.
Maybe something like EP for McTavish, Mintyukov, '27 2nd (they have 2) or top-10 protected 2026 1st, then in the offseason, something like 2nd + Aman for W. Karlsson?
No way.There hasnt been a player like Pettersson available in a long time (if he is available).
26 YO in his prime guaranteed for the next 8 years. If he was playing at his top shape, he obviously wouldnt be available.
I think the most recent comparison is Jack Eichel, but even Eichel wasnt on Peteys level when he was traded. Also Eichel had major injury concerns with his spine.
BUF received
Tuch
Krebs
1st
2nd
If Petey were to be traded, i could see a similar package except a bit more.
Young top 6 player (preferably center or D)
Top prospect (at the time of the trade Krebs was Vegas's top prospect)
Mid 1st
2nd
Its either that, or a top player in a 1 for 1 trade.
At the end of the day, we are talking about a career PPG player with 400+ GP. Hes gonna command a lot.
@Diablo2020 so you have gave up on Pettersson?
Ive been on the trade Petey and trade Miller train for years so this thread is my gloryday.
I get Barry Pederson vibes.
So many times ive seen "Trading Petey is Cam Neely 2.0" when in reality Pettersson is Pederson. Look at the hockey db.
Barrys back problems are Peteys wrist knee and mental block issues.
I want my own Neely and Glen Wesley.
Ducks are ripe for the picking
Slugs are ripe for the picking
Rags are ripe for the picking
Isles are ripe for the picking
Every team is ripe for the picking.
All this drama couldnt be happening at a better time with t-minus 6 months to NMC.
Sabres too. I’ll give ya Power and picks for Miller
Sabres too. I’ll give ya Power and picks for Miller
Maybe you should be a GM.what is it with the canucks committing to long and big tickets and then trading them off / running them out of town? (luongo). Seems like if you're offering someone an 8 year deal you're choosing to go forward with them regardless. How did they even allow themselves to get to this position?
if i'm choosing between the two i'm easily taking EP40 but i think fans are overrating the asset as he's having a bad year and was a shrinking violet in his last playoff series.
Eichel was always right around a ppg when he was traded. He def had the upside we see now but Petey has had 100 point season. And doesn't have the whole neck issue.No way.
Eichel > Pettersson.
Was back then, still is. Likely seen the same way by scouts and NHL management teams.
Playing on a brutal team like the Sabres is a lot different than playing on a playoff team featuring Hughes as the teams production driving QB, which would explain the production differences.
That said, Eichel’s return was depressed due to a clown show situation in Buffalo with his neck injury and all the question marks surrounding it. So if EP40’s return is similar it would be explained by that. Not EP40 being better than Eichel.
Miller is definitely Barry Pederson here. The vet with a strong history of production but on the wrong side of 30. The trick is can we land a Cam Neely for Miller.Ive been on the trade Petey and trade Miller train for years so this thread is my gloryday.
I get Barry Pederson vibes.
So many times ive seen "Trading Petey is Cam Neely 2.0" when in reality Pettersson is Pederson. Look at the hockey db.
Barrys back problems are Peteys wrist knee and mental block issues.
I want my own Neely and Glen Wesley.
Ducks are ripe for the picking
Slugs are ripe for the picking
Rags are ripe for the picking
Isles are ripe for the picking
Every team is ripe for the picking.
All this drama couldnt be happening at a better time with t-minus 6 months to NMC.
Oof. I would highly advise against that.Sabres too. I’ll give ya Power and picks for Miller
While I haven't been on board with trading either:Ive been on the trade Petey and trade Miller train for years so this thread is my gloryday.
I get Barry Pederson vibes.
So many times ive seen "Trading Petey is Cam Neely 2.0" when in reality Pettersson is Pederson. Look at the hockey db.
Barrys back problems are Peteys wrist knee and mental block issues.
I want my own Neely and Glen Wesley.
Ducks are ripe for the picking
Slugs are ripe for the picking
Rags are ripe for the picking
Isles are ripe for the picking
Every team is ripe for the picking.
All this drama couldnt be happening at a better time with t-minus 6 months to NMC.
Eichel was always right around a ppg when he was traded. He def had the upside we see now but Petey has had 100 point season. And doesn't have the whole neck issue.
Eichel played with Reinhart and Dahlin in his best seasons in Buffalo. Peteys best season he was 26 points ahead of Hughes. It wasn't quite as pronounced how much the team ran through Hughes then as it is now.
Miller is definitely Barry Pederson here. The vet with a strong history of production but on the wrong side of 30. The trick is can we land a Cam Neely for Miller.
Yes I’m very aware of Peteys flash-in-the-pan 100 pt season. But I don’t think that’s the player he is, things went very right that contract season, it’s an outlier season.Eichel was always right around a ppg when he was traded. He def had the upside we see now but Petey has had 100 point season. And doesn't have the whole neck issue.
Eichel played with Reinhart and Dahlin in his best seasons in Buffalo. Peteys best season he was 26 points ahead of Hughes. It wasn't quite as pronounced how much the team ran through Hughes then as it is now.
Miller is definitely Barry Pederson here. The vet with a strong history of production but on the wrong side of 30. The trick is can we land a Cam Neely for Miller.
Canucks fans it was just media stirring sh** up?
If Power is getting traded its straight up for Pettersson. Miller is 5 years older and has a no movement clause.Sabres too. I’ll give ya Power and picks for Miller