Kane scores at a 50 goal pace on MacDavid’s wing, easily and adds depth to a paper thin roster. I’d take a chance on him in a heartbeat. It’s not like Edmonton’s locker room could get worse.
can Kane play goalie?
Would be drop the grievance if this could happen? If not he has to wait until that process is completed before he can sign anywhere I would think.
Is contract reinstatement a possible consequence of the grievance process? If not, I don't see why he couldn't move on.I don't see how he could sign elsewhere until his grievance is settled. But this is probably a good indication of how Kane's camp expects the grievance to play out.
Lebrun in the video confirmed that is free to sign where he wants starting when his contracted cleared and was terminated yesterday.I don't see how he could sign elsewhere until his grievance is settled. But this is probably a good indication of how Kane's camp expects the grievance to play out.
Is contract reinstatement a possible consequence of the grievance process? If not, I don't see why he couldn't move on.
Kane in Edmonton adding to the circus? Sign me up.
Is contract reinstatement a possible consequence of the grievance process? If not, I don't see why he couldn't move on.
If kane signed with the Oilers, we could then redirect assets and cap space to the goal position. It would be like getting a 6-7million dollar winger for a fraction of the price. Kane + an upgrade in goal and Oilers are a playoff contender. Defence still needs work and has obvious question marks, but at the very least we can fix a top line winger addition 3 C and a goalie in two moves. A signing and then a trade. We go from 4 holes to 1 obvious hole.
Lebrun in the video confirmed that is free to sign where he wants starting when his contracted cleared and was terminated yesterday.
The Oilers are top 10 draft pick contender, not a playoff contender. Kane or not.
I do not believe the contract will he reinstated. Most likely, Sharks and the NHLPA will have a cash settlement. Kane gets a % of his 23M that was owing divided by three years, with no cap penalty.As far as I'm aware, Bill Daly has basically said there is nothing stopping Kane from signing a new deal. That could just be NHL being confident that reinstatement will not be an outcome.
Yeah, my guess is that teams were interested but not at the cap hit and term (in case of further issues), and hence no waiver claims.I'm on board if this is a cheap cap hit. Kane's a legit power forward on the ice. Even with all his off ice issues, he lead San Jose last season.
The club has lost 11 straight under Tippett, bringing in Kane can't make that worse. Adding a top 6 forward without moving assets and only using a limited amount of cap is a no brainer. This actually makes it easier to address goaltending and LD as we can allocate any tradable assets and cap towards those holes.
The Oilers are top 10 draft pick contender, not a playoff contender. Kane or not.
Yeah, my guess is that teams were interested but not at the cap hit and term (in case of further issues), and hence no waiver claims.