Player Discussion Evan Bouchard

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Sure, maybe both. But the OP said just Bouchard...so same logic should apply. One of McDavid or Drai.

Mackinnon is having a fantastic year, way better than Mcdavid.but Col hasn't been very good this year and just got into a playoff spot. Now imagine them without Makar. They'd be awful.
Most teams would still make the playoffs with either one of McDavid or Drai or Makar or Mackinnon added. Bouchard doesn't have that kind of game breaking affect on a team. He's good to have, not on their level. Not even close. The guys you mentioned, can get away with 10 subpar games in a season. Bouchard shows up maybe half of the season. Until he bring his compete level up, he's not there.

I would take another Ekholm over Bouchard but that's just me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Whoshattenkirkshoes
Then you let him walk because Bouchard isn't worth anything north of 8. He makes so many brain dead mistakes and athletically just doesn't have it. Put Bouchard on the bottom 20 teams in the league and he's probably making 4-5 million

Let a player like Bouchard walk and then the team will spend years again looking for a player of his caliber to replace him. That's just utter nonsense.
 
This couldn't be more false. I was the one who recognized this last year and saw it coming. I was the one who when he was putting up "big numbers" was still criticizing his play while you guys shit all over me.

I've always said Bouchard makes good plays, but he makes WAAAAAY too many bad plays to be considered elite and make big $$$.

Pretty sure you, Jimmi and Tobias are the ones who have gone silent. The irony....
I haven’t gone quiet, it’s just a waste of my time talking to someone who only sees all the bad plays, and somehow his “eye” test is more important than all other eye tests and stats.

It’s the same as when people crying about Bouchard getting shots blocked.

Quinn Hughes and Cale makar get just as many shots blocked, this stuff is easy to look up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McAsuno
I haven’t gone quiet, it’s just a waste of my time talking to someone who only sees all the bad plays, and somehow his “eye” test is more important than all other eye tests and stats.

It’s the same as when people crying about Bouchard getting shots blocked.

Quinn Hughes and Cale makar get just as many shots blocked, this stuff is easy to look up.

If not for Bouchard, the team would've been knocked out by Vancouver last year also. Bouchard has his gaffes for sure this season, but you'd think he's the antichrist on defense with the way posters like him yap.


But muh eye testttttt
 
If not for Bouchard, the team would've been knocked out by Vancouver last year also. Bouchard has his gaffes for sure this season, but you'd think he's the antichrist on defense with the way posters like him yap.


But muh eye testttttt

I was watching replays of the kings series last playoffs and I was surprised how many bad turnovers doughty had, considering he'd be considered an elite D by shittyshoes.
 
I was watching replays of the kings series last playoffs and I was surprised how many bad turnovers doughty had, considering he'd be considered an elite D by shittyshoes.
Doughty was a clown. Often making clown plays. I don't know why people fear this guy, I didn't last year, I expected he'd shit the bed, he's all reputation at this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gunnersaurus Rex
I haven’t gone quiet, it’s just a waste of my time talking to someone who only sees all the bad plays, and somehow his “eye” test is more important than all other eye tests and stats.

It’s the same as when people crying about Bouchard getting shots blocked.

Quinn Hughes and Cale makar get just as many shots blocked, this stuff is easy to look up.
Dude Bouchard has been horrible this year. It's you guys not seeing the bad plays game after game after game.

He's not a bad player, but he's not in the elite category.

He makes decisions too slowly and teams have figured him out.
 
Last edited:
Lolol. You critised him in the playoffs. How dumb is that?. He was excellent 98% of those playoffs but you felt the need to bash him? For what?....oh, I remember,
you went bananas for the giveaway at the blueline vs LA. However, it was 100% Foegles fault, yet you pinned it on Bouchard

The reason ppl bashed you is cherry picking a bad play here or there in those playoffs is just moronic. In a run filled w/ thousands of good plays, only to focus on a few bad ones..well that's just illogical

As I stated, the one you were most vocal about...you didn't even have the capacity to even understand the play
I criticized him before the playoffs and In the playoffs because I saw what was coming with Bouchard. Yes he had a great playoffs, but these underling issues were there and now we have to deal with them

You guys are part of some Bouchard cult where you can't criticize the guy. He's been awful.
 
I criticized him before the playoffs and In the playoffs because I saw what was coming with Bouchard. Yes he had a great playoffs, but these underling issues were there and now we have to deal with them

You guys are part of some Bouchard cult where you can't criticize the guy. He's been awful.

He's struggling. Not awful. There's a difference but you wouldn't know that cuz you only see what you want to

It's already been established you don't really understand hockey very well and what's happening on the ice half the time
 

Ad

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad