Even if I agree that those are pretty comparable players from a value perspective (I do agree), that doesn't make them comparable contracts, nor does it exactly help our case to keep his AAV low.
Theodore
- IMO is a better all around player (but not nearly as strong offensively), but the contract isn't a comparable.
- He's signed for $7.5M from ages 30 to 36.... that's way at the tail end of his peak.
- Bouchard's contract is going to be from 26 to 33 = not comparable
- Not to mention Bouchard's outscoring numbers (even this year @ 54%) are consistently above Theodore's and the obvious counting numbers offensively are also not close, one guy is 50-60 points while playing primo pp mins, the other guy is 60-80
Sergachev
- Signed for $8.5M in July 2022 after a 64 point campaign. I agree, that's a pretty good comparable.
- The cap was 82.5M. Still the tail end of covid days and projections were murky, so that would have hurt his camp.
- Even still... That prorates to $9.53... oh look, that's exactly the number I had for Bouch on a deferred contract!
Chabot
- Signed in year 2 of his ELC in 2019
- He'd just scored 55 points, so negotiations favored him (but he hasn't done that since)
- Bouchard's camp would certainly argue that he's accomplished more than Chabot, but he doesn't even need to argue that strongly because:
- Chabot's contract was 10% of the cap... cap will be 92.5M next year, so Bouchard could use this as a comp to justify $9.25M and argue/negotiate up from there... all the stats are in his favor
Dobson
- Let's see what happens, Bouchard should be in the same range, but get ~$500K more than Dobson IMO... comparable players for sure, but Bouch has accomplished more, I don't think that's particularly debatable.
As for Makar... the eye test says he's a world apart from Bouchard. But then the eye test says McDavid is a world apart from Draisaitl. Some of that is style points going to the faster, more dynamic player vs a more cerebral puck movement game which is garnished with a better shot.
That aside, here are the numbers... these are both primary PP guys, so it is worthwhile to show "all situations" to capture their power play in addition to 5v5. I've also factored McK/R & McDrai out and colored the
winning and
losing numbers (all from NaturalStatTrick):
Makar
- This year:
- With McK/R: 5v5 GF% = 59 , 5v5 xGF% = 64, Overall GF% (incl PP): 67
- Without McK/R: 5v5 GF% = 22 (OUCH!) , 5v5 xGF% = 43
- Last year:
- With McK/R: 5v5 GF% = 59, 5v5 xGF% = 55 , Overall GF% (incl PP): 70
- Without McK/R: 5v5 GF% = 43, 5v5 xGF% = 51
- Contract negotiation year:
- With McK/R: 5v5 GF% = 62 , 5v5 xGF% = 66 , Overall GF% (incl PP): 72
- Without McK/R: 5v5 GF% = 71, 5v5 xGF% = 57
Bouchard
- This year:
- With McDrai: 5v5 GF% = 76, 5v5 xGF% = 64 , Overall GF% (incl PP) = 75
- Without McDrai: 5v5 GF% = 45, 5v5 xGF% = 49 ,
- Last year:
- With McDrai: 5v5 GF% = 72 , 5v5 xGF% = 62 , Overall GF% (incl PP) = 77
- Without McDrai: 5v5 GF% = 54, 5v5 xGF% = 55 ,
- Contract negotiation year: Same as this year.
- With McDrai: 5v5 GF% = 76, 5v5 xGF% = 64 , Overall GF% (incl PP) = 75
- Without McDrai: 5v5 GF% = 45, 5v5 xGF% = 49
It's a pretty stark comparison and definitely favors Bouchard overall. Obviously Makar had a monster contract year, which helped him.
And I'm not saying Bouchard is as good as Makar... I'm saying his agent (Dave Gagner) is going to say that and his agent has the numbers on his side.
This is going to be a tough negotiation.