Agent Zuuuub
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2015
- 15,662
- 13,324
why do you think that will work? He was excellent in Ottawa as "the guy" and scored 101 points as "the guy" on the sharks. Every season he's had to share top dog responsibilities he hasnt been great. This exact reasoning is why the trade to Pitt was stupid from the start (since they have Letang).
Why are people trying to triple down on something that demonstrably doesnt work??
i mean the only time San Jose was good was the first year Karlsson was there, and what didn't work then? They made it to WCF.
Sharks were dominant with Karlsson and Burns on different pairings that year and the only reason they didn't win the cup was injuries. After that season they didn't become bad because Karlsson and Burns were sharing duties its because they lost their depth + Pavelski who was the glue for the forwards.
In Pittsburgh the team was already on the way down before Karlsson got there. So it's not that Pittsburgh sucked because they had Letang and Karlsson sharing, its that Pittsburgh would be mediocre unless you could rewind the time on Crosby, Malkin, etc