Player Discussion Erik Brannstrom

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
22,803
16,307
It's time for an official Brannstrom thread.

This guy has been such a pleasant surprise. Our already thin/topheavy D corps would be a f***ing dog's breakfast without him working out as well as he has so far.
Not much doubt about it.....he's exceeded accounts received. Even the Canucks weren't over the moon when they acquired him.

It was more about dumping Poolman's contract and getting something back in return. And they immediately placed him on waivers, available to anybody around the NHL. Must a few teams now who are wondering why they pay pro scouting staffs.

But he's made the most of his chance......his skating, puck-handling and head-manning skills were totally AWOL once you got past Hughes and Hronek, so he fills a real void.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AlainVigneaultsGum

Jyrki

Benning has been purged! VANmen!
May 24, 2011
13,631
2,943
溫哥華
It's like gaining an extra 1st rounder from the 2017-2019 era. A much needed young-ish defenceman who can contribute on a cheap contract.

I think the Avalanche are regretting letting him go so soon.
Kinda crazy that Tanev, Forsling and Chatfield all slipped through Jimbo's fingers when they were stuck to his hands, meanwhile Chef Allvin nabbed Hronek, Soucy and Brannstrom from a position of weakness, plus the good run with Z. Not like he always hits (i.e. Desharnais/Forbort looking sus) but being able to make so many positive additions to the blueline while having serious cap + asset constraints has been very impressive.

Brann has shown so many signs of being a legit Top-4 D-man, I just hope he doesn't get rocked one day and that makes him scared of stepping up.
 

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
22,803
16,307
Noticed a brief smattering of 'boos' in the early going when Brannstrom was handling the puck tonight. Sens fans still haven't forgiven him for being the center-piece of the Vegas trade for poplular captain Mark Stone.

But from what I can gather, he tried his best in Ottawa, but got benched or demoted every time he made a mistake. Watching this current Sens blueline, it's hard to figure how he couldn't have helped if they'd qualified him.

But obviously the Canucks are glad they didn't. And getting his services for just $900,000 is a serious salary cap bonus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChilliBilly

RandV

It's a wolf v2.0
Jul 29, 2003
27,043
5,167
Vancouver
Visit site
It's like gaining an extra 1st rounder from the 2017-2019 era. A much needed young-ish defenceman who can contribute on a cheap contract.

I think the Avalanche are regretting letting him go so soon.
I'd say the Avs get a pass here and aren't going to have any regrets. Cheap FA depth signing who stunk it up in camp, can't really blame them that they got a chance to drop him so they did. And they have a stronger blueline to begin with.

Sometimes players need to bounce around to a few teams before they figure it out, can't really blame the teams that were short stops along the way.
 

F A N

Registered User
Aug 12, 2005
19,549
6,422
We've gotten returns from $900K-making Brannstrom so far which is what any teams looking to contend needs. I've always liked Brannstrom (granted I'm usually a sucker for former high draft picks) but I think the reality is that Brannstrom, like many undersized defenseman, was stuck playing more or less a 3rd pairing shutdown role. Teams tend not to value players like that. Whether it's Stecher or Bear before him, it doesn't matter the results unless it leads to good counting stats - if the role is that of a 3rd pairing defensemen teams tend to prefer bigger guys who at least have a reputation of being better defensively.

It will be awesome if Brannstrom can somehow turn into a top 4 Dman for us. He's provided us with a much needed puckmover on the backend outside of Hughes and Hronek.
 

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
22,803
16,307
Has Tocchet almost accidentally stumbled on a second pairing that could actually work?

After Hughes was ejected, Tocchet paired Brannstrom with Myers, and the two seemed to form instant chemistry. Myers can usually win the puck battles; but his first pass and zone exits can be a total misadventure.

But if he can give the puck to Brannstrom with some time and space--he's effective at finding the open guy or skating the puck out himself.

It's strange, when they trying paring a puck-carrying d-man like Hughes with Myers, it was unmitigated disaster. But for some reason Myers and Brannstrom just seemed to mesh--at least for one game. But wouldn't surprise me if went back to that pairing in Boston.
 

mriswith

Registered User
Oct 12, 2011
4,517
8,213
Tocchet's slowly starting to trust him more and more. He's been creeping up the ice time chart.

Started the month as the clear #6d and has since passed VD and the last couple games he passed Soucy as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HockeyWooot

ratbid

Registered User
Feb 18, 2012
727
904
Has Tocchet almost accidentally stumbled on a second pairing that could actually work?

After Hughes was ejected, Tocchet paired Brannstrom with Myers, and the two seemed to form instant chemistry. Myers can usually win the puck battles; but his first pass and zone exits can be a total misadventure.

But if he can give the puck to Brannstrom with some time and space--he's effective at finding the open guy or skating the puck out himself.

It's strange, when they trying paring a puck-carrying d-man like Hughes with Myers, it was unmitigated disaster. But for some reason Myers and Brannstrom just seemed to mesh--at least for one game. But wouldn't surprise me if went back to that pairing in Boston.
I swear Myers is the most enigmatic player in terms of who he works with. Just random chemistry with certain players, without any particular rhyme or reason to it. Top it off, the chemistry will look dynamite for a season or so and then magically disappear.

Obviously just one game, but if Brannstrom - Myers could be an effective pairing, this would be a massive win.
 

tanti9

Registered User
Dec 18, 2023
49
23
Maybe it is time to think of maybe extending Brannstrom before he prices himself out of our range? I do not think I would be opposed to a 2 year at $1.5? I mean he could hold out for more on the open market but in Van, they have given him a chance and he seems to be resurrecting a career that a couple of months ago looked like he could be heading overseas.
 

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
16,752
17,238
Victoria
Like I said when they acquired him, he is legitimately their third best defenseman right now. Tocc is reluctantly starting to up his usage, but unfortunately I think brass will be looking for a way to boot him from the lineup once they find a defensive upgrade.

But they'd be in a really bad spot if Allvin didn't luck into him.
 

iceburg

Don't ask why
Aug 31, 2003
7,786
4,192
If he was right handed management would be talking him up like he would be in the top 6 for years to come.
They should really get over the righty/lefty thing and lock him in as a go to right side Dman.

In two years time after Soucy's contract is up.:

Hughes-Hronek
FA* - Willander
D-Petey**-Brannstrom
Myers

*Left handed D are much easier to come by and less expensive in free agency. Should be able to get a top 4 shutdown/PK guy for a reasonable cap hit.

**or whoever else steps up from within.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad