NOA
Registered User
- Apr 17, 2015
- 3,258
- 1,606
Mostly agree with ya but me personally, I never was hyped about the ‘top 9.’ Certainly the top 7 on paper had high expectations but I think many (I know i definitely did) had some pause about the forward depth and I was worried from the get go about their 8/9 forwards (let alone a useless 4th line) really slowing down any hope at consistent offensive production. Right now, they are only in position to ‘stack’ one line so it’s not unexpected that this one stacked line is the one doing the most damage. They need another top 6 forward to really create more balance and help someone like Terrance out. Until that happens, there is a definite ceiling to how good this team can be. Terrance is a good player but he’s not somebody who can carry offense on his own and if he were, he would have been a top 1st round NHL pick..I think Stan had to do something because the Frasca/Spence reuinion has, at least to this point, been a failure.
Spence being in his draft year can help the Otters in the short term significantly from a marketing perspective should he and Schaefer both be top 5 (they likely will both be top 10).
In doing so, Terrance has been forced to take more of a grit role, as was described. IMO Roysten, Hammond, and Messier have not taken the necessary jumps to this point and Edwards has regressed. Call it whatever you want, but I feel the top 9 on paper to start were stellar and haven't played to expectations, Terrance included. If they were, we wouldn't be seeing line shifts reminiscent of the Hartsburg Era.
he’s a 2 way forward who has some skill to do damage on the offensive end, especially at this level, but when he’s playing with Edwards, Royston (their 6th, 8th best forwards?) then he’s going to be limited in Butlers system.