I don't agree. Most styles are reliant on talent and players using their instincts to make good plays. Stan's (in the past, maybe he's changed?) is not reliant on that at all, which is why skilled players get frustrated because it takes a lot of their creativity out of their game. But the depth guys typically flourish for him and reach more of their full OHL potential because they're more willing to play that role.
North Bay now is way, way, way more free flowing and run and gun than they ever were under Stan. Other than their jerseys being the same and them having some tall players, its not very similar at all.
Assume that'll be the case. Butler was always the coach and GM because he needs an exact roster of "his type of guys" to succeed with his style
I would expect Butler has changed a bit. He has seen things from a different perspective the past couple of years. And he looks healthy and a whole lot more relaxed than his final 1.5 seasons when he was not behind the bench for much of that time and unable to be on the ice for practice at all.
Look closely, the play and players are not at all noticeably different from Butler and his disciples. The difference is 5 years (2001-2005 born) of 5-6 picks by round 4, including a 1st overall import and 1st overall RD that is an integral part of the right of centre stretch break out set up by the left board funnel D that has been in place for at least a decade.
If you can’t watch; look at past names, positions, results. Is it coincidence that the top point and/or goal scorers are RW from Goodrow, Brazeau, Coe, MacDonald; all the power centres from Zito, Jackson, MacKenzie, Amadio; and Dineen, Swede import, Nelson are PP QB and top scoring D that play the right side? Have a gander at the size/type of LD drafted by Dennis.