gary69
Registered User
If we go way back to old-timers. biggest what if strory is Stanley Matthews. He was a regular since 18 (played 17 matches before that), but then missed his possibly best years aged 25-30 because of war.
And even so played about 650 matches at top level (and over 700 in total). If he only could have changed the last 5 or seasons to those missed prime years, he still would have played until being cirka 40 years old.
Puskas was a starter between 18-37, but hard to say how tough were the other teams in Hungary during the first half of his career. Interesting comparison to him is Alfredo di Stefano, who was about same age, but was a starter from 20 - 40. I think potentially a player should have better years at 18-19 than late 30s, so ideally it would be better to break though as teenager rather than have more longevity towards the end of career. At least sportingwise, not sure if financially it's better the other way round.
Obvious player doing well in the matches played since their teenage years are James Milner, Gareth Barry and Ryan Giggs.
And even so played about 650 matches at top level (and over 700 in total). If he only could have changed the last 5 or seasons to those missed prime years, he still would have played until being cirka 40 years old.
Puskas was a starter between 18-37, but hard to say how tough were the other teams in Hungary during the first half of his career. Interesting comparison to him is Alfredo di Stefano, who was about same age, but was a starter from 20 - 40. I think potentially a player should have better years at 18-19 than late 30s, so ideally it would be better to break though as teenager rather than have more longevity towards the end of career. At least sportingwise, not sure if financially it's better the other way round.
Obvious player doing well in the matches played since their teenage years are James Milner, Gareth Barry and Ryan Giggs.
Last edited: