The Last Red
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2022
- 658
- 705
Bingo! Such an obvious response.Big part of the reason they have 12 players in double digits on goals is Lane Hutson, hence his 51 assists
What This Means for You:
Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.
In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord ServerBingo! Such an obvious response.Big part of the reason they have 12 players in double digits on goals is Lane Hutson, hence his 51 assists
Its not that. At least it isn't to me. Having the best offensive season for a defenseman since Nick Lidstrom back in 1991 (that is 34 years ago!) with the 320 goal Red Wings, while Hutson is doing it on the 250 goal Canadiens. 34 years is a LONG time.We can also admit that Hutson leading a bad Habs club to the playoff race is impressive.
Reminds me of the years when we’d go into a season with everyone saying we’re a lottery team, get dragged to the playoffs and win a couple rounds because of Price, and then everyone says Price isn’t actually that goodNever thought I'd see the day that Hutson having guys like Dvorak, Anderson, Gallagher, Evans, and Armia on his team would be held against him lmao
Its not that. At least it isn't to me. Having the best offensive season for a defenseman since Nick Lidstrom back in 1991 (that is 34 years ago!) with the 320 goal Red Wings, while Hutson is doing it on the 250 goal Canadiens. 34 years is a LONG time.
I have no problem acknowledging that the other rookies have had incredible seasons, and that Celebrini will likely be the better player in the future.
I just don't know how you can look past the historical significance of Hutsons season.
Well, we all know guys like Caufield and Suzuki and Laine have never proven to be scorers before Hutson got there.Big part of the reason they have 12 players in double digits on goals is Lane Hutson, hence his 51 assists
Yeah man I’m sure you thought they were all superstars before this exact moment where it has suddenly become convenient for youWell, we all know guys like Caufield and Suzuki and Laine have never proven to be scorers before Hutson got there.
Suzuki and Caufield are legit first liners and Laine is just a beautiful man, I think this should be common knowledge by nowYeah man I’m sure you thought they were all superstars before this exact moment where it has suddenly become convenient for you
Edit: I take it back, you actually have praised them lots in the past
Suzuki and Caufield are legit first liners and Laine is just a beautiful man, I think this should be common knowledge by now
I've been pretty high on Montreal's future for a while.Yeah man I’m sure you thought they were all superstars before this exact moment where it has suddenly become convenient for you
Edit: I take it back, you actually have praised them lots in the past
Laine > WennbergDidn’t think about this, Sharks have Wennberg who is the beautifullest man. Will probably hurt Celebrini’s Calder chances.
Laine > Wennberg
It's mostly because St Louis spread the TOI evently between the bottom 3 lines. Montreal basically has one 1st line and three legit 3rd line.The habs are where they are because they’re getting offensive contributions up and down the lineup. They already have 12 players in double digits on goals. Sharks will be lucky to have 5.
Dvorak had 5 goals in 30 games last year just give it up already.Sounds like Dvorak wouldn’t have double digit goals without Hutson, he’d have 8
Yeah exactlyThe Habs offense is better this year with Hutson in it.
That's fair, but also a testament to the depth the Habs have and the importance of having it. Sharks ultimately front-loaded the top line (or two lines), so most of the scoring came from being thrown onto Celebrini's wing (in Kunin's case for example).It's mostly because St Louis spread the TOI evently between the bottom 3 lines. Montreal basically has one 1st line and three legit 3rd line.
Montreal has 10 players playing on average 14+ minutes. SJ has only 8 players playing 14+ minutes on average. Of all players in SJ playing 14+ all but one scored 10 goals. And the one who did not has 9 so he could very well finish with 10.
SJ sold at the deadline and Montreal did not. This also skew the result. SJ has 7 players who scored 10 goals this year. Zetterlund, Kenin and Grandlund were traded but they still scored 10 goals for SJ this year while wering a SJ jersey.
You’re living in a dream world. How can I trust any of your arguments about Hutson as good faith, now?
EDIT:
Nvm, I can see it
![]()
You can make a strong case for any of the Top 3.
Celebrini is on the worst team and has the best PPG.
Hutson has the most points, as a dman, and is an integral part of a team fighting for a Playoff spot.
Michkov is also on a shit team, had to deal with notorious ballbuster Torts, and has the most Goals and the best PP/60
You really can't go wrong this season with any of the 3.
...Wolf is also still a very viable candidate...this is the best Calder race in many years and might be the tightest vote...
In case anyone was wondering the burden Hutson has been bearing this last month:
At this point, Hutson is the right choice. We'll see how it all shakes out but what he's doing is just too good to be ignored. You're talking about a top 5 rookie season all time for a blueliner. The others are having great years and may go onto better careers, but relatively speaking I think Hutson's the right choice.Its not that. At least it isn't to me. Having the best offensive season for a defenseman since Nick Lidstrom back in 1991 (that is 34 years ago!) with the 320 goal Red Wings, while Hutson is doing it on the 250 goal Canadiens. 34 years is a LONG time.
I have no problem acknowledging that the other rookies have had incredible seasons, and that Celebrini will likely be the better player in the future.
I just don't know how you can look past the historical significance of Hutsons season.
Aren't those guys all worth 1st round picks tho?Never thought I'd see the day that Hutson having guys like Dvorak, Anderson, Gallagher, Evans, and Armia on his team would be held against him lmao
Swear Habs were predicted to be "in the mix" or something, don't need to change narrative to make a pointeveryone forgets the HF braintrust pre season predictions. Habs were definitely predicted. to be a lottery team, and I bet a lot of these pessimistic predictions were made by the same taters that are using lane's strong team against him for the calder.
I pity these people, desperately hoping for the failure of another team instead of just cheering for your own and enjoying the sport.
Prove it. Most of us hoped we would be “in the mix”, but expected another top 10 or top 5 pick. Go read the threads.Swear Habs were predicted to be "in the mix" or something, don't need to change narrative to make a point