Epic Calder Race 2024-25

Vegas had Michkov as a favorite at one point this year or no?
Michkov was a favorite and Celebrini was a longshot through Michkov's 12/10 when he went on an extended 0 streak. Celebrini was injured for 12 games after the opener and was like +800 in Vegas, but then he took over in Dec as the front runner and has stayed there.

AGAIN -- anything could happen -- but the odds will move less the further along we are in the season, less uncertainty. It's a 3 horse race unless Michkov goes on like a ppg+ tear, he's been cold since 12/10... 5 points in 6 earlier this month before 5 games straight with 0 points and only 5 shots. And Wolf is still a longshot to overcome the anti-goalie bias. Celebrini is front-runner according to Vegas, implied 55% chance, Hutson not far behind at ~40%ish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frank Drebin
Can't have a conversation with a person who thinks the word "had" is present tense.
He meant "Didn't Vegas have Michkov as a front runner" - e.g. minorly edited "Vegas had Michkov as a favorite at one point this year, right? or no?"
 
He meant "Didn't Vegas have Michkov as a front runner" - e.g. minorly edited "Vegas had Michkov as a favorite at one point this year, right? or no?"
I seem to be having issues with tenses but I was simply trying to illustrate that todays present is the futures past, things can change.

One thing is that while others have moved in and out Celebrini has firmly been in either the top or second place for the entirety of the season
 
He meant "Didn't Vegas have Michkov as a front runner" - e.g. minorly edited "Vegas had Michkov as a favorite at one point this year, right? or no?"
What he meant is clear. What can't be explained is how Michkov's past odds contradict Celebrini's current Vegas odds favoring him over Hutson - which is the comment to which he initially responded.
 
Actually, one of them isn't. Celebrini hasn't had a stretch of more than two games without a point except the first week after he came back from injury. He's been the model of consistency. Every other rookie has had long stretches of poor play. Celebrini hasn't.

Every time I come into the thread, there's a new flavor of the month people are claiming is better than Mack. First it was Michkov, then it was Hutson, now it's Wolf. They're all great players, but they have not consistently played at a top line level the way Celebrini has all year.

If Celebrini goes ice cold down the stretch, then there's a discussion to be had. But I don't see that happening.
1pts in 5games in the beggining of january isn't good and pretty much a slump.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad