so you can't point out anything biased?
I actually did though.
Its pretty clear that the thought of Hutson winning the Calder bothers you.
Why would it bother me, like I said i have no dog in the race and even though I think Celebrini is the better rookie so far, I really have no problem if hutson wins it becasue of an injury to celebrini or he steps up even more and ceelbrini declines in play.
Once again you are trying to state things for me, which kind of of shows your bias again.
I think that I would have a much better idea on my feelings on this thread than you do.
Downplaying his "fine" season, purposefully ignoring the potential to beat the all time record for assists by a rookie dman, appealing to the PWHA as if their votes really mean anything.
Sure why would the actual voters feeling right now on the award they will be voting for later this year mean anything?
So what if he breaks 60 assists, his overall play right now is what is being judged as for celebrini as well.
But who knows maybe some voters will be impressed by that.
Also if you want to look back Murphy didn't win the Calder that year when he had 60 assists and he had 16 goals too.
What if he scores 10 goals the rest of the way and only gets 20 more assists does that matter or is the actual overall play and impact the thing that should be judged here?
Instead of pointing out how clearly biased I am you start to lean into the personal insults.
You started the bias game here and didn't bother to read my comments and then pretended to speak for me on 2 occasions now so I wouldn't go down that road.