Pretty sure with out his KHl contract, he goes second overall in the draft.I'm just glad a Flyers 7th overall pick is being compared to two first overall picks (Bedard & Celebrini) ...this is great news!
Pretty sure with out his KHl contract, he goes second overall in the draft.I'm just glad a Flyers 7th overall pick is being compared to two first overall picks (Bedard & Celebrini) ...this is great news!
Game winning, power play, overtime assist tonight. That's worth like 10 points right?
Couldn’t you argue that being able to score in a sudden death situation is more important than when there is less pressure?OT Goals are like shoot-out goals. They’re cool, and they help get a team regular season points, which is valuable. I never suggested it wasn’t.
But it doesn’t mean anything for playoff performance and as the fan of a franchise that won a lot of regular season games and zero Stanley Cups, I’m personally not all that interested in them as a metric of a player’s value.
I’d rather have the 3-0 go ahead regulation goal, yes, even in the case of an 8-2 game. A goal that opens the game up into a blowout is better than an OT goal, because it contributed to a regulation win, which is better than an OT win.
Don't worry. The Flyers will screw it up like they always do.I'm just glad a Flyers 7th overall pick is being compared to two first overall picks (Bedard & Celebrini) ...this is great news!
Yeah, I buy that. I wasn’t saying that OT goals aren’t valuable at all; I think they are, obviously, good to score because they win you an extra point and the point you make here about “clutch” is probably true too. But it would also be true of shootout goals (which are also good to score). In a vacuum yes, someone who scores a lot in OT is someone I’d want on my team because they help win me games.Couldn’t you argue that being able to score in a sudden death situation is more important than when there is less pressure?
maybe the goal itself is less valuable, but the fact that the player was able to preform in that situation is encouraging.
You could argue that if most of the players points are only on the pp, or 3v3, then they are a good specialist, but if you can add that they score those type of goals in addition to a good amount of 5v5 points then it means something.
Although to argue against myself I do remember a player who only scored around 20 goals with about half of them being gwg one season, and won the rocket trophy the next season
Lane Hutson, a defenseman, is currently second in points for a rookie, behind only Mitchkov, while also being one of two defensemen on the team that doesn't make us cry at night
Those who thinks he doesn't have a shot at the Calder don't know wtf they're talking about
He's in the mix, but let's not forget that Celebrini missed 12GP (close to PPG) and Wolf is having a quite impressive start so far.
It's still wide open
Probably needs some goals to go with his assists but yeah he's definitely in the mix.Lane Hutson, a defenseman, is currently second in points for a rookie, behind only Mitchkov, while also being one of two defensemen on the team that doesn't make us cry at night
Those who thinks he doesn't have a shot at the Calder don't know wtf they're talking about
Now now, I got laughed at for saying the same thing the other day. It's too early to tell yet either way.Lane Hutson, a defenseman, is currently second in points for a rookie, behind only Mitchkov, while also being one of two defensemen on the team that doesn't make us cry at night
Those who thinks he doesn't have a shot at the Calder don't know wtf they're talking about
Tell that to Brock FaberI doubt Hutson wins if michkov continues his play, but being a D improves his nomination chances
haha just saying considering the leaders in the race so far. Other years might not have space for a D (deserved or not)Tell that to Brock Faber
Don't worry. The Flyers will screw it up like they always do.
Yeah, secondary assist on PP goal in OT - it's actually minus 3 to points total...
If it was to a Chinese goalie it would have been minus 4...