WilliamInLondon
Registered User
- Mar 24, 2016
- 461
- 358
Completely forgot about the bolded, but I remember this now that you bring it up.Not sure Mitch is as care free as he likes to be characterized. Before his draft there was a THN article about how he suffered a crisis in confidence in London and had to go home to Toronto and reconnect with a Don Mills guy to get some perspective before going back to the Knights to find his game.
He seems like a very sensitive person who has to project a callousness without understanding how to connect to the market. For a guy from the market, it’s shocking.
Even the way he was “mistreated” by Toronto, it doesn’t really register with me. Schedule A vs B bonuses. I think before Mitch a lot of people would have never even thought about them. He certainly made all his money back in short order.
Babcock gate. I dunno, seemed like a negative experience but the stuff of legend?
The incessant comparisons to the franchise’s first overall pick?
Just seems like he could have been a lot more easygoing about things and still gotten like at least 98% of what he ended up with. He put himself in a pretzel.
The rest of your post - I think it does underscore the fact that the GM's responsibility with player acquisition/development is understanding better the psyche of a player's ability to cope with playing in Toronto lol. I actually agree with the points raised in Matthew Tkatchuk's interview more than I disagree with it.