Empty net goal scoring is getting out of control

Derailed75

Registered User
Jan 5, 2021
5,269
12,640
Danville
I find it adds excitement to the game. When the goalie is pulled its kind of a do or die for the team with 6 skaters. Two years ago Iwas at a Canes-Sharks game, the Shraks lead by one when RBA pulled the goalie. The Sharks quickly scored to make it a 2 goal lead, but RBA pulled the goalie again and the Canes scored. Pulled him again and the Canes tied it with 12 seconds left and than won in OT.

It was the most exciting sporting event I have seen live.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Casey Jones

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
86,507
143,488
Bojangles Parking Lot
Not sure what makes me feel older, Bure scoring 60 in ‘94 or HF coming around in 2000

I actually had to double-check his stats when making that comment because I mentally round Bure’s ‘00 and ‘01 up to 60 goals, but he never actually hit that number after ‘94.

(Of course, scoring 58 in 2000 had the value of scoring like 70 in ‘94)

I REALLY wish HF had been around and archived in the early 90s. That would have been loads of fun.
 
  • Like
Reactions: x Tame Impala

Three On Zero

HF Designated Parking Instructor
Sponsor
Oct 9, 2012
32,379
31,304
I actually had to double-check his stats when making that comment because I mentally round Bure’s ‘00 and ‘01 up to 60 goals, but he never actually hit that number after ‘94.

(Of course, scoring 58 in 2000 had the value of scoring like 70 in ‘94)

I REALLY wish HF had been around and archived in the early 90s. That would have been loads of fun.
Yeah, I just wish I hadn’t forgot about my original account from the way back. Back when you needed an invite to join the forum
 
  • Like
Reactions: tarheelhockey

Peltz

Registered User
Oct 4, 2019
3,732
5,225
Sure, that makes a lot of sense analytically and there’s little doubt pulling the goalie earlier statistically improves a team’s chances of winning. But is it good for the integrity of the sport I wonder?
There is absolutely nothing at stake here with hockey's integrity by pulling the goalie early.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JMCx4

Peltz

Registered User
Oct 4, 2019
3,732
5,225
Unpopular opinion: ENG shouldn't have any more value to a player's stat sheet than shootout goals.
I don't like this. They're real goals. When one team pulls the goalie, the odds of EITHER team scoring increases. If a 6 on 5 goal counts the same statistically, one way, then it should count the same the other way too.

Shootout goals are totally different.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sadekuuro

JPeeper

Registered User
Jan 4, 2015
12,177
9,612
Sure, that makes a lot of sense analytically and there’s little doubt pulling the goalie earlier statistically improves a team’s chances of winning. But is it good for the integrity of the sport I wonder?

Teams doing whatever it takes to win is now not good for the integrity of the game? I don't see it that way. The only argument(s) that could be made for the integrity of the game going down is 3 on 3 OT and a shootout. As someone who isn't even against them in the first place I think they're objectively stupid ways to end a professional game, they're skill competitions.

The NBA and MLB (gross) are the only two leagues where I think have perfect OT rules, NBA just adds some time and you play, MLB is the same but with now a runner so an already boring AF game actually ends in a reasonable time. NFL OT rules are stupid.
 

PaulD

71,73,76,77,78,79,86,93
Feb 4, 2016
31,314
18,390
Dundas
Most teams are pulling goalies with around 2 minutes left nowadays because analytics told that's the way if you want to change something. Naturally, if you are going to play with an empty net twice as long, opponents will score into it many more times. Not to mention that last minutes used to be given to "shutdown lines" to handle on the defensive side of things who would just get the puck out of the zone and change, shooting at an empty net was almost taboo. While now we often see top guys on the ice whose primary focus is to get that empty netter which ends the game.
Yup. That's why EN goals are up. Hasn't been a mystery.

But yea players are padding their stats with them.
Add them to players over all stats.....as pp goals, short handed goals, game winning goals .

Al Iafrate had an opinion of the types of people who get empty netters
🤣
 
Last edited:

MoneyManny

Registered User
Jun 28, 2021
975
1,506
I don't like this. They're real goals. When one team pulls the goalie, the odds of EITHER team scoring increases. If a 6 on 5 goal counts the same statistically, one way, then it should count the same the other way too.

Shootout goals are totally different.
I dunno, i feel like tossing the puck from the blue line nonchalantly in an empty net isn't really worthy of a +1 goal in the player's stat sheet.

It's also heavily influenced by the number of times the team is leading late in the 3rd.
 

CaptBrannigan

Registered User
Apr 5, 2006
4,296
1,625
Tampa
Disagree about ENG not counting on personal stats. If you did that you’d have to remove goals that the scorer has even less agency over, like cross crease passes that were never on net that defensemen direct in, goals deflected by a scorer where it hits them and they have no intent to do so, the rare puck passed into your own net when a goalie goes to the bench on a delayed penalty, etc. All of those are less deserved than most ENGs.
 

MadLuke

Registered User
Jan 18, 2011
10,667
6,173
This is nothing new, when Pavel Bure scored his 60 goal season 10 of them were into an empty net and no one cried about his numbers being skewed.
I think it depends, from memory some scorer like Brett Hull did complain about other people scoring empty netter, either directly or by pointing out that they did not:

”I do remember when I was in Quebec and he was in St. Louis, it was one of his 80-goal years,” Sakic said. ”We were on the ice, and we pull our goalie. There’s a D-man that fires it off the glass and he’s basically got a two-on-one empty net. Then he circles back, throws it back to the defenseman. I was like, ’What is going on?’ So I asked him on the ice after the game, and he said that he would’ve score, but since the D-man threw it off the glass to him, he said, ’I’m not giving the D a cheap assist for throwing it off the glass.’”

He scored only 11 of his 700 something's goals empty netter.

I imagine it always existed among some, it is a bit petty and make it soundlike you care way too much about numbers and not at all about your team winning, so they keep it more on the down low.
 

MadLuke

Registered User
Jan 18, 2011
10,667
6,173
Its true, even goalies and defensive defenceman are practicing their shots from long range to get the numbers up
And also winning the hockey game, it is an important play with a giant swing in winning chance for the team that score (if it is not the very last second and considering how early they get them out and the consequence of missing the net if it is not a pk...)
 

DitchMarner

TheGlitchintheSwitch
Jul 21, 2017
11,103
8,072
Brampton, ON
I definitely think so. But it also seems like teams often pull the goalie when down by two or three (sometimes even more) goals nowadays. Was this always the case?

Example: Last night the Bruins were trailing the Leafs 3-0 and pulled their goalie with about 4:00 left. TOR scored another goal immediately. It seems situations like this (in the RS) are more common than they were 10-15 years ago.
 

Toby91ca

Registered User
Oct 17, 2022
2,488
1,830
So ? Pavel Bure had like 10 every season
At least make a statement that is close to accurate. He had 9 one year but his career average is 2. Other than the year he had 9, his high is 4. He had 0 or 1 in 6 of his 12 year career.
 

JMCx4

Welcome to: The Dumbing Down Era of HFBoards
Sep 3, 2017
15,022
9,924
St. Louis, MO
Sure, that makes a lot of sense analytically and there’s little doubt pulling the goalie earlier statistically improves a team’s chances of winning. But is it good for the integrity of the sport I wonder? ...
Integrity in the NHL left the ice decades ago. Stick with your stats.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad