6-10 mins a night is for a 4th line plug, those are 4th line forward minutes. Even the WORST bottom pairing dmen in the league average 13 mins + per game, if Emelin gets PK time he'd easily average ~17 mins a night even on a 3rd pair at 5v5.
P.S: Over the past 3 seasons Emelin has averaged 21 mins+ per game (vs solid competition), i dont think Hanifin would be getting more minutes than Emelin if they were to play on the same team.. unless Hanifin gets way more ice time and plays vs way better competition than he did last season..
Comparing an 18 year old in his 1st NHL season and drawing a conclusion as to how they'll be used going forward is a bit misleading. Your overall point is valid though, he'd get considerably more than 10 min. if he was on Carolina.
And do you really think your management would bring up Fleury/Carrick/Pesce/Hanifin/Slavin at the same time without surrounding them with vets? Those guys are all 22 and under.
First, I think you are a bit misinformed. Pesce, Hanifin and Slavin are already on the NHL team and were last year. There's no "bringing up" for them, they are already "UP".
Second, Faulk and Hainsey are on the team and are vets, so it's not like the Canes ONLY have 22 and under guys. Yes, Faulk is only 24, but he has as much NHL experience as Emelin.
Third, YES, I do think the Canes management will do this, because here are all the defensemen who are left in camp today:
Hainsey: 35 (Lock to be in NHL)
Faulk: 24 (Lock to be in NHL)
Slavin: 22 (Lock to be in NHL)
Pesce: 21 (Lock to be in NHL)
Hanifin: 19 (Lock to be in NHL)
Murphy: 23 (very likely to be in NHL)
Carrick: 22
Fleury: 20
McKeown: 20
Don't get me wrong. I would not have a problem having Emelin, or another VET on the Canes, and leaving Fleury, Carrick and McKeown in the AHL. I just don't see them taking on a defenseman for $4.2M and $4.4M over the next 2 years and giving up a prospect to get him.
As I said earlier, I also would think the Canes are probably on Emelin's NTC list.