Unbiased Fan
Registered User
- May 24, 2019
- 3,802
- 1,803
Jiricek, Werenski, Boqvist and 3rd overall for Elias Petterson and Quinn Hughes
He would look good as a 3C for the Devils.
Hughes and Hischier are too soft for that though.Damn, Hischier as 4C would be incredible
Danm , not sure what to think about that one , but im sure Van takes thisJiricek, Werenski, Boqvist and 3rd overall for Elias Petterson and Quinn Hughes
Not bad actually... I'd prefer a young F over Boqvist though
Given the value of potential top players on ELCs I doubt CBJ would want part of this.
I’ve never seen a few fans of a team more obsessed with such a bizarre argument to continually insert it into unrelated threads. Truly fascinating.Dunno, seems like it would be hard for Pettersson to take minutes away from a Selke nominee.
Envidsson, Raymond and your 1st. So probably not happening.Wonder what Vancouver would want from Detroit.
He'd be a fit for them.
Snowball downhill?? They just bought out OEL so that's a huge improvement right there broVancouver is continuing to snowball downhill, what incentive does Elias have to stay with the franchise past 2024? How much confidence is there in Elias actually signing a long-term extension? What is he valued at right now and what might his value be if he ends up requesting a trade? What teams do you think would move multiple assets to get him? This is an elite 1C and he now has a 102 point season in the books, what would it take Vancouver fans?
-$7,350,000 until 2024
-will be RFA
View attachment 718610
Pettersson and Hughes are untouchableWonder what Vancouver would want from Detroit.
He'd be a fit for them.
No way Vancouver takes that. That is some Benning caliber trade right there. Trade our best young players that are proven in NHL for a bunch of potentials. The only potential I consider trading for is BedardDanm , not sure what to think about that one , but im sure Van takes this
Yes play the center that had more points and better D than Jack Hughes on the 3rd line. If anything he would be the first line center for the devil's and bump Jack Hughes down lolHe would look good as a 3C for the Devils.
Blame your favourite sour fruit for that.I’ve never seen a few fans of a team more obsessed with such a bizarre argument to continually insert it into unrelated threads. Truly fascinating.
There’s not a chance in hell Columbus would ever offer that.
But nice to think not bad for value
No reason to have sour grapes over pettersson when hischier is still great and you have a far better team but you do youBlame your favourite sour fruit for that.
Hughes for Werenski and BoqvistDanm , not sure what to think about that one , but im sure Van takes this
Insecurities require therapy.No reason to have sour grapes over pettersson when hischier is still great and you have a far better team but you do you
I'd consider Makar for him plius all things consideredthis guys one of the most valuable players in the league.
no way in hell he gets traded
Swap Boqvist for Sillinger or Kent Johnson.3rd, Jiricek, Roslovic (Cap), Boqvist
A guy who had more points than anyone on the team would be playing 3CHe would look good as a 3C for the Devils.
Johnson and Jiricek are the only untouchables we have. And a prospect like Sillinger/Mateychuk probably isn’t enough.I would prefer Johnson, but I think that is to much from the jackets perspective
Lmao no. Also, those two aren’t close to being equal.Swap Boqvist for Sillinger or Kent Johnson.
No - thank you. If you want the 3oa & 34oa then Laine is out#3, #34, Laine, Peeke/Boqvist/Ceulemans <-> Pettersson, #11 ???
Nah... lolMakar is going to cost too much to keep soon enough and .may want to go home to Calgary
That seems like a huge overpay#3, #34, Laine, Peeke/Boqvist/Ceulemans <-> Pettersson, #11 ???
Canucks easily say no#3, #34, Laine, Peeke/Boqvist/Ceulemans <-> Pettersson, #11 ???
LOL the difference in value between Pettersson for #3 ovr + 34 + 1 of Peeke/Boqvist/Cuelemans is larger than the difference between #11 for Laine.No - thank you. If you want the 3oa & 34oa then Laine is out