Player Discussion Elias Pettersson Talk | Also Chiropractors, the Medical Staff, and You

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hodgy

Registered User
Feb 23, 2012
4,849
5,060
I think Pettersson’s struggles are probably a bit of both bad play and his linemates.

It’s right that no other top player has to carry crap like Mikheyev, Lafferty, etc. like he had to down the stretch last year.

As an aside, it is too bad they couldn’t make it work with Kuzmenko as the two did get elite results when together. Pettersson scored 3.7 P/60 with him and they had ~55% of the goals when on the ice. Pettersson’s defensive results are better without him but not enough to offset the loss in offence.

At the same time, at even strength over his last half season’s worth of games he’s scored at a ~30 point/82 game pace. That’s the production you get from a good middle six forward playing with other middle six players.

Ya, there is a weird false dichotomy here where people are looking for a singular explanation for his bad play. To me, its a combination of him just playing poorly and his linemates. If it was just the latter you’d expect him to look better at even strength and see plays die on his teammates sticks, or for him to still dominate in the power play, but neither is the case. He just looks pretty bad, relatively speaking, no matter the context.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pitseleh and Vector

Hodgy

Registered User
Feb 23, 2012
4,849
5,060
As an aside, based on contributing to HF for like 20 years, when a player or prospect is playing poorly and excuses are made for that player, like 80% of the time those excuses turn out to be unwarranted. It’s just the reality of fan-based forum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coffee

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
55,977
92,657
Vancouver, BC
I think this fanbase just needs somebody to complain about. Miller was equally divisive and that was proven to be absolutely stupid as well. Sedin hate was also f***ing stupid.

This isn't 'needs someone to complain about'.

Pettersson has 0 ES goals in 34 games. 1 ES goal in his last 40 games. He has looked absolutely horrific for half a season. This would be a major story for any superstar athlete in any sport in any city.

It's not 'hate'. It's one of our most important players playing so badly that if it continues it essentially ends our competitive window. It's a big f***ing deal.
 

Bonham

Registered User
Nov 24, 2008
1,922
1,882
Victoria, BC
This isn't 'needs someone to complain about'.

Pettersson has 0 ES goals in 34 games. 1 ES goal in his last 40 games. He has looked absolutely horrific for half a season. This would be a major story for any superstar athlete in any sport in any city.

It's not 'hate'. It's one of our most important players playing so badly that if it continues it essentially ends our competitive window. It's a big f***ing deal.
I knew it was bad but I didn't realize it was that bad.

Those are replacement level numbers.
 

arttk

Registered User
Feb 16, 2006
19,368
11,278
Los Angeles
This isn't 'needs someone to complain about'.

Pettersson has 0 ES goals in 34 games. 1 ES goal in his last 40 games. He has looked absolutely horrific for half a season. This would be a major story for any superstar athlete in any sport in any city.

It's not 'hate'. It's one of our most important players playing so badly that if it continues it essentially ends our competitive window. It's a big f***ing deal.
We are talking about different things here. I do think there is legit concern that he has not recovered in form, I think those convos are justified and valid. I think where I don't agree is the hysteria around it and from some posters, the f***ing hate.

There is a big difference between saying he's struggling and that's a concern vs using that and laddering to the idea about how he was bad since after Oct and he simply is not the same player as before when the numbers clearly do not suppor that.

That is a classic case of you guys want a conclusion to be true and just trying to rationalize that rather letting the evidence guide you to it. You cannot be shit and put up PPG+ ES numbers with both linemates putting up 2 and 3 points respectively at the same time, that's just not factual and the evidence doesnt support it. If your eye test says he sucks and yet he put up like 100+ point pace(including PP production), then your eyes are wrong because there is no f***ing wrong way to put up 100+ point pace. Hell if you drop somebody into this thread and read all the messages about him, one would assume he put up like 30ish points, not 89 points last season.

And most importantly, no he was not horrific for half a season, his slump started post Feb. he scored 13 points in Dec, 21 in Jan and 11 in Feb and then the production dropped starting march. When you guys take the truth and stretch it, you lose credibility. He scored at a slightly lower pace in Feb compared to Dec and Nov, like literally 1 or 2 point difference. Hell in March, he scored 4 goals which is the exact same amount he scored in Nov and Dec and he scored only 5 in Oct when apparently he was hot, like come on.

Yes, he did slump and if you look at the numbers, it really started at end of March lasting through the playoffs. I think if his linemates actually were a little bit better in april and march, his points total would probably be in the 100s but people would still be concern because his playoffs numbers would still be shit.

At the end of the day, my view on this is a bunch of people are just stretching the truth to make it seem like, Petey is f***ing done, in fact he was so done that he was cooked since after his hot streak in Oct when the truth is he peaked in Jan and put up 136 point pace that month and then his performance dropped right exactly when his injury was reported and even then it didn't drop that much, it went down to a 76 point pace the following month then to 60 point pace the following and then 50 point pace in the last month and 40 point pace in the playoffs. It's almost like his effectiveness gradually decreased as he kept on playing through his injury. But a gradual decrease in effectiveness from playing through an injury doesn't sound as alarming and sensational as, HE WAS f***ING SHITE IN 40 GAMES, ABSOLUTE TRASH I TELL YOU.
 

arttk

Registered User
Feb 16, 2006
19,368
11,278
Los Angeles
I knew it was bad but I didn't realize it was that bad.

Those are replacement level numbers.
Point pace per month.

Jan : 136pt
Feb : 76pt
Mar: 60pt
Apr: 50pt
Playoffs: 40pt

At no point was he a replacement level player. Yes his ES scoring dropped, but why are we pretending that PP scoring and ES assists doesn't count?
 

Bonham

Registered User
Nov 24, 2008
1,922
1,882
Victoria, BC
Point pace per month.

Jan : 136pt
Feb : 76pt
Mar: 60pt
Apr: 50pt
Playoffs: 40pt

At no point was he a replacement level player. Yes his ES scoring dropped, but why are we pretending that PP scoring and ES assists doesn't count?
Of course he isn't a replacement level player.

The context is in regards to his ES scoring, ie. 1 ES goal in his last 40 games and 34 games without an ES goal.

Pacing 2 ES goals over a season of games is abysmal goal scoring production, especially for a player in that position in the lineup.

I expect him to break out of the slump, but those numbers speak to his play lately.
 

arttk

Registered User
Feb 16, 2006
19,368
11,278
Los Angeles
Of course he isn't a replacement level player.

The context is in regards to his ES scoring, ie. 1 ES goal in his last 40 games and 34 games without an ES goal.

Pacing 2 ES goals over a season of games is abysmal goal scoring production, especially for a player in that position in the lineup.

I expect him to break out of the slump, but those numbers speak to his play lately.
I mean 40 goals a season would be a top scorer in the league and that means the player doesn't score in half the games. And it's totally reasonable that a 40 goal scorer gets like 10 from the PP so that's like really 30 ES goals across 82 games. if you include the fact scorers are more likely to score in bunches, like 2 goals in 1 game, hat tricks and not all 30ES goals are spread across 30 games. You are looking at like closer to upward of 60 games where a top goal scorer doesn't actually score in ES.

Example, Nylander, 40 goal scorer and 11 came on PP. So he didn't score an ES goal in 59 games. That's just how the math works even for guys who score 40 and Petey is not even a 40 goal scorer and majority of his points are from assists.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Hollywood Burrows

pitseleh

Registered User
Jul 30, 2005
19,388
3,422
Vancouver
The 0 ES goals stat wouldn’t be a problem if he just had a bad run of SH% luck but he’s also down to about a shot per game at ES over that period, well below his career average. If that’s a new norm it is going to cost him ~10 goals per year.
 

RobertKron

Registered User
Sep 1, 2007
16,130
9,745
I mean, production aside, it is pretty understandably cause for concern when one of the most dynamic players I've ever seen in a Canucks sweater just loses that element of their game more-or-less completely. Something has very visibly been off with this player - and yes it has waxed and waned somewhat - since basically the beginning of last season, and regardless of production it's not unreasonable to be alarmed. This is clearly more than just "even the best don't score every game" and framing it as anything like that is just kind of absurd.
 
Last edited:

kanucks25

Chris Tanev #1 Fan
Nov 29, 2013
7,237
4,264
Surrey, BC
I mean 40 goals a season would be a top scorer in the league and that means the player doesn't score in half the games. And it's totally reasonable that a 40 goal scorer gets like 10 from the PP so that's like really 30 ES goals across 82 games. if you include the fact scorers are more likely to score in bunches, like 2 goals in 1 game, hat tricks and not all 30ES goals are spread across 30 games. You are looking at like closer to upward of 60 games where a top goal scorer doesn't actually score in ES.

Example, Nylander, 40 goal scorer and 11 came on PP. So he didn't score an ES goal in 59 games. That's just how the math works even for guys who score 40 and Petey is not even a 40 goal scorer and majority of his points are from assists.

My guy, what are you actually talking about lol.

Of course a player is going to have well over 40 games throughout a season where they don't score an ES goal.

But there's a big difference between 1 goal over a select 40 games versus 1 goal over 40 _consecutive_ games which is what the post you quoted is referring to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sandwichbird2023

crowfish

Registered User
Jun 3, 2011
1,156
1,536
1 ESG in the last 40 games is even worse than I realized.

That’s waiver wire material

Look at all that lovely waiver wire material.

1c61b92df72fcfb0f9e05a0ae3d0a957.png
 
  • Love
Reactions: Coffee

arttk

Registered User
Feb 16, 2006
19,368
11,278
Los Angeles
My guy, what are you actually talking about lol.

Of course a player is going to have well over 40 games throughout a season where they don't score an ES goal.

But there's a big difference between 1 goal over a select 40 games versus 1 goal over 40 _consecutive_ games which is what the post you quoted is referring to.
i mean if you are going to cherry pick and ignore the PP goals that are scored within that 33 game period, of course it will look worse.

Also he did score 5 goals within that 40 game period and also put up 14 assists so 19 points in 40 games. It's not to his standards but overall like 20 points in 40 games just sounds like a player going through a bad slump.

Like am i concern that he is not scoring, yeah of course I am. I just don't think I am concern to the point where I think he is cooked and we should run him out of town like many of you here think we should. I think we've seen him bounce back after recovering from an injury that affects him.
 
Last edited:

RobsonStreet

Registered User
Jun 4, 2004
764
347
I mean 40 goals a season would be a top scorer in the league and that means the player doesn't score in half the games. And it's totally reasonable that a 40 goal scorer gets like 10 from the PP so that's like really 30 ES goals across 82 games. if you include the fact scorers are more likely to score in bunches, like 2 goals in 1 game, hat tricks and not all 30ES goals are spread across 30 games. You are looking at like closer to upward of 60 games where a top goal scorer doesn't actually score in ES.

Example, Nylander, 40 goal scorer and 11 came on PP. So he didn't score an ES goal in 59 games. That's just how the math works even for guys who score 40 and Petey is not even a 40 goal scorer and majority of his points are from assists.
Just so everyone’s clear, Pettersson has scored .27 goals per game at even strength over his career. If we take that as his baseline, the probability of him going 34 consecutive games without an ESG by chance alone is (1-.27)^34 or 0.0000225 (two one-thousandths of a percent). Something’s up.
 

arttk

Registered User
Feb 16, 2006
19,368
11,278
Los Angeles
Just so everyone’s clear, Pettersson has scored .27 goals per game at even strength over his career. If we take that as his baseline, the probability of him going 34 consecutive games without an ESG by chance alone is (1-.27)^34 or 0.0000225 (two one-thousandths of a percent). Something’s up.
actually the odds is 1 in 2162, so .000463 so it's .0463%.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Coffee

Bobby9

Registered User
Feb 10, 2019
2,392
3,301
Just so everyone’s clear, Pettersson has scored .27 goals per game at even strength over his career. If we take that as his baseline, the probability of him going 34 consecutive games without an ESG by chance alone is (1-.27)^34 or 0.0000225 (two one-thousandths of a percent). Something’s up.
Actually it’s 100% because it happened
 

Jay26

Registered User
Jul 13, 2022
2,869
3,640
Kamloops
Hate is such a overblown word. Maybe a few posters have expressed opinions that can be classified as "hate", but nobody else here is hating on him. We're just not patting him on the back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AzNightmare

bandwagonesque

I eat Kraft Dinner and I vote
Mar 5, 2014
7,543
5,956
I mean, production aside, it is pretty understandably cause for concern when one of the most dynamic players I've ever seen in a Canucks sweater just loses that element of their game more-or-less completely. Something has very visibly been off with this player - and yes it has waxed and waned somewhat - since basically the beginning of last season, and regardless of production it's not unreasonable to be alarmed. This is clearly more than just "even the best don't score every game" and framing it as anything like that is just kind of absurd.
It's this exactly. His floor is high because he's smart, but being smart is all he does anymore. There's no explosiveness to his game, he never gets loose and forces a dilemma on the opposition's defence. He just makes the correct high-percentage play and stays in his lane. It's not the same player we saw a few years ago.
 

Ernie

Registered User
Aug 3, 2004
13,131
2,815
It's obvious on many levels that he's not playing well. I don't think anyone can argue with that.

But it's getting a little weird how many people seem to be projecting all over him.

We have no idea whether this just the kind of slump that every star goes through at some point in their careers or there something more to it behind the scenes. But the commonly floated idea here that this is some kind of deep personal flaw with him is just cringy - it's like they want him to fail.

For my part, absent any actual information, I'm just going to keep cheering for this player and hope for the best. If he can turn it back on and the rest of the team can play like they did in the playoffs, along with Demko being healthy, we could win it all.
 

Coffee

Take one step towards the direction you want to go
Nov 12, 2021
9,224
8,072
It's obvious on many levels that he's not playing well. I don't think anyone can argue with that.

But it's getting a little weird how many people seem to be projecting all over him.

We have no idea whether this just the kind of slump that every star goes through at some point in their careers or there something more to it behind the scenes. But the commonly floated idea here that this is some kind of deep personal flaw with him is just cringy - it's like they want him to fail.

For my part, absent any actual information, I'm just going to keep cheering for this player and hope for the best. If he can turn it back on and the rest of the team can play like they did in the playoffs, along with Demko being healthy, we could win it all.
Yeah definitely. Plus this is all setting up for an amazing story line if you think about it.

Elias Pettersson has turned into the underdog.

The more adversity a team faces, the more satisfying the 16th post season win will be. No one can deny that truth.
 

AzNightmare

Unregistered User
May 11, 2011
1,815
1,553
I strongly believe in Petey still. The Monstars didn’t zap his superstar talent. He needs to get his confidence back which will happen at some point.

At this rate, some supernatural event of some alien stealing his powers would make me less concerned than an elite allstar player suddenly turning 180º because of a natural slump that lasts for months and beyond, multiple times in a career.

Please give Petey back his powers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad