Toggle sidebar

Elias Pettersson or Jack Hughes?

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates

Who would you take for the next 8 years?

  • Pettersson

    Votes: 153 30.1%

  • Hughes

    Votes: 319 62.7%

  • Undecided, flip a coin

    Votes: 37 7.3%
  • Total voters
    509
Buck Naked said:
You're free to post something that disputes it.

EDIT:

Just for you. Or are all models crap when they show something you don't agree with?

download-3.png
Click to expand...
Literally not his card
LOL

first dead giveaway, he didnt play 82 games.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: authentic
Breakers said:
Literally not his card
LOL

first dead giveaway, he didnt play 82 games.
Click to expand...

It absolutely is. It's a projection over 82 games based of off what he did during his first 44 games. As you can see, it says Generated: 2023-01-18 at the bottom, which is the "first dead giveaway" you should've been looking for. Nice try though!
 
Petterson was better last year. Same offensive production. Petterson finished 9th in PPG while Hughes was right behind him. But Petterson had the defensive edge, finishing 7th in selke voting while Hughes got no consideration for the award.

That being said, Hughes is 3 years younger, and Petterson was nowhere near that level at the same age. I think the evidence points to Hughes having the higher offensive potential, which might be realized as soon as this season.

I personally see Petterson being a selke contender or just on the outside for the duration of his prime, and I can't say the same for Hughes at the moment. But, I believe defensive acumen is overall easier to teach than the higher offensive ceiling that Hughes has. For that reason, im going with Hughes. But it's not an answer I'm overly confident in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bh53 and xigon
Felidae said:
Petterson was better last year. Same offensive production. Petterson finished 9th in PPG while Hughes was right behind him. But Petterson had the defensive edge, finishing 7th in selke voting while Hughes got no consideration for the award.

That being said, Hughes is 3 years younger, and Petterson was nowhere near that level at the same age. I think the evidence points to Hughes having the higher offensive potential, which might be realized as soon as this season.

I personally see Petterson being a selke contender or just on the outside for the duration of his prime, and I can't say the same for Hughes at the moment. But, I believe defensive acumen is overall easier to teach than the higher offensive ceiling that Hughes has. For that reason, im going with Hughes. But it's not an answer I'm overly confident in.
Click to expand...
Great post.

Also what baby animal is that in your picture ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Felidae
Buck Naked said:
It absolutely is. It's a projection over 82 games based of off what he did during his first 44 games. As you can see, it says Generated: 2023-01-18 at the bottom, which is the "first dead giveaway" you should've been looking for. Nice try though!
Click to expand...

And look at his real card
Funny why you didn’t post the that
Embarrassing to post a projection off a season that has happened
 
Breakers said:
And look at his real card
Funny why you didn’t post the that
Embarrassing to post a projection off a season that has happened
Click to expand...

I don't pay for that kind of shit and therefore didn't have access to it. Just took what I found of off Google.

You don't believe in them though, so what does it matter to you that the number is lesser? You're just in here trying hard at being a dick.
 
Buck Naked said:
I don't pay for that kind of shit and therefore didn't have access to it. Just took what I found of off Google.

You don't believe in them though, so what does it matter to you that the number is lesser? You're just in here trying hard at being a dick.
Click to expand...
I think many would agree with the first part of your statement but then wonder why post those cards at all?


There is more nuance to evaluating players than pulling out some random stat cards.
 
Ace of Hades said:
Yes, good for him. He's considered more valuable given his contract status and being younger.
Nothing more.

Most consider EP to the better player. Both are in the same tier as of now.
Click to expand...

Inccorect, but keep telling yourself that. lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom