He said Petey played terrible for 8 months and he was bad in the playoffs. You can’t read?
Wow, ok then.
Have a wonderful evening!
He said Petey played terrible for 8 months and he was bad in the playoffs. You can’t read?
Needs more shouting and stick swings tho.Nice hit on Stuztle!
Now five more games of data:
May as well move the team because they traded a 90 point Centre for an 80 point winger. Now I've heard it all. And I was not advocating this trade but your post has to be sarcasm and I'm just not picking it up. Tkachuk is NOT a complimentary player.Imagine they traded EP for B Tkachuk like some fans suggested
Would have been the worst trade in franchise history, might as well move the team at that point .
All people see are stats, they never realize how much of a negative influence Tkachuk is to his team. He is a complementary player, not a leader.
The ultimate smaller brother syndrome
Didnt call Tkachuk a p***y last game so he has no heart.Needs more shouting and stick swings tho.
Jim really was special.It boggles my mind that we once had Pettersson, Miller and Horvat down the middle and couldn’t even make the playoffs
lol has a single player even done that in the last 20 years? Mackinnon has over 100 points twice in 12 years. I’ll take one cupHe’s doing better than he was over the last 8 months but he still is not justifying his cap hit.
He’s the 5th highest player in the NHL. He has to be the best player on the team day in and day out for 7 years. He can’t disappear for 40 games. That’s insane.
That’s what he sighed up for with his contract.
100 points per year MINIMUM for 7 years straight. Hard stop. Anything else is a bad contract. God forbid anybody expect that from him.
lol has a single player even done that in the last 20 years? Mackinnon has over 100 points twice in 12 years. I’ll take one cup
We’re getting zero cups of our highest paid player is not scoring 100 points.lol has a single player even done that in the last 20 years? Mackinnon has over 100 points twice in 12 years. I’ll take one cup
Now five more games of data:
- Still zero bursts in the top category.
- Six more in the middle category (14 in 14 to 20 in 19).
- 30 more in the lowest category (7 per game in his first 14, 6 per game since).
Play has improved but his top end speed still looks the same. Obviously not holding him back but will be interesting to follow as the season goes on.
Imma take a wild guess and say it's not Elias Pettersson.haha last 20 years? in NHL history only one guy has ever had seven straight 100 pt seasons
As a percent of cap at time of contract starting, Pettersson is the 21st highest paid player in the league. Actual dollar amount is not meaningful in a cap era.He’s doing better than he was over the last 8 months but he still is not justifying his cap hit.
He’s the 5th highest player in the NHL. He has to be the best player on the team day in and day out for 7 years. He can’t disappear for 40 games. That’s insane.
That’s what he sighed up for with his contract.
100 points per year MINIMUM for 7 years straight. Hard stop. Anything else is a bad contract. God forbid anybody expect that from him.
Well yes, I’m too young to remember trade that happened before I was bornMay as well move the team because they traded a 90 point Centre for an 80 point winger. Now I've heard it all. And I was not advocating this trade but your post has to be sarcasm and I'm just not picking it up. Tkachuk is NOT a complimentary player.
You're obviously too young to remember Vaive and Derlago for Tiger or Cam Neely and a 1st for Barry Pederson.
I think the PP thing is just coaching decision, Tocchet runs P1 and he loves his point shot and tip inHe's doing better no doubt about it. But he still is extremely reluctant to shoot, I counted three times where he had a solid chance to shoot and ended up passing (and nothing really of consequences resulted). Also he still has difficulty getting open on the PP ( yesterday on our first PP unit even with Boeser, Miller and Hughes gone, he was not getting the puck much, with it being left with Garland to direct shots at the net). So happy he is doing better but still has a ways to go I feel.
As a percent of cap at time of contract starting, Pettersson is the 21st highest paid player in the league. Actual dollar amount is not meaningful in a cap era.
Being outside the top 20 in cap burden when signed is about right, if not an underpayment. Also the minimum expectation you are putting is for him to do something only one player has ever done, so... maybe a bit unreasonable (to put it mildly).
Incidentally, if you think he should have 100 points even when he's no longer going to be a top 20 contract in raw dollars 7 years from now just because he is top 5 now, then you don't seem to have a consistent standard at all.
Where are you getting the 21st highest paid player stat from? Are you counting expired contracts like Ovechkin and Malkin's previous deal?
I think at a certain point it doesn't really matter whether Petey has the 5th highest cap hit or 10th or even 20th. At the end of the day it's a big contract and the team is banking on the player being a star player. I think you can win by overpaying your star player. I don't think you can win when your star player isn't one of the best players in the game.
Sure, but he was being asked to do things only one other player has done in nhl history… there is a huge dishonesty being asked of this player, that has little to do with him being good, or even living up to his current contract