Player Discussion Elias Pettersson - A Forward Who Scores

Billy Kvcmu

Registered User
Dec 5, 2014
28,630
17,416
West Vancouver
Imagine they traded EP for B Tkachuk like some fans suggested

Would have been the worst trade in franchise history, might as well move the team at that point .

All people see are stats, they never realize how much of a negative influence Tkachuk is to his team. He is a complementary player, not a leader.

The ultimate smaller brother syndrome
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bgav and racerjoe

pitseleh

Registered User
Jul 30, 2005
19,406
3,513
Vancouver
Now five more games of data:

- Still zero bursts in the top category.
- Six more in the middle category (14 in 14 to 20 in 19).
- 30 more in the lowest category (7 per game in his first 14, 6 per game since).

Play has improved but his top end speed still looks the same. Obviously not holding him back but will be interesting to follow as the season goes on.
 

Raistlin

Registered User
Aug 25, 2006
5,079
4,016
In the Ottawa game for that last goal, I like where he ended up. He walked straight into traffic and stayed there. That was something missing in the past 40 games.
 

sid232

Registered User
Oct 9, 2019
26
23
He's doing better no doubt about it. But he still is extremely reluctant to shoot, I counted three times where he had a solid chance to shoot and ended up passing (and nothing really of consequences resulted). Also he still has difficulty getting open on the PP ( yesterday on our first PP unit even with Boeser, Miller and Hughes gone, he was not getting the puck much, with it being left with Garland to direct shots at the net). So happy he is doing better but still has a ways to go I feel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kanucks25

HairyKneel

Registered User
Jun 5, 2023
1,565
1,445
Imagine they traded EP for B Tkachuk like some fans suggested

Would have been the worst trade in franchise history, might as well move the team at that point .

All people see are stats, they never realize how much of a negative influence Tkachuk is to his team. He is a complementary player, not a leader.

The ultimate smaller brother syndrome
May as well move the team because they traded a 90 point Centre for an 80 point winger. Now I've heard it all. And I was not advocating this trade but your post has to be sarcasm and I'm just not picking it up. Tkachuk is NOT a complimentary player.

You're obviously too young to remember Vaive and Derlago for Tiger or Cam Neely and a 1st for Barry Pederson.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: kanucks25

Bobby9

Registered User
Feb 10, 2019
2,434
3,347
He’s doing better than he was over the last 8 months but he still is not justifying his cap hit.

He’s the 5th highest player in the NHL. He has to be the best player on the team day in and day out for 7 years. He can’t disappear for 40 games. That’s insane.

That’s what he sighed up for with his contract.

100 points per year MINIMUM for 7 years straight. Hard stop. Anything else is a bad contract. God forbid anybody expect that from him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luiginb

Bgav

We Stylin'
Sponsor
Sep 3, 2009
24,372
6,254
Vancouver
He’s doing better than he was over the last 8 months but he still is not justifying his cap hit.

He’s the 5th highest player in the NHL. He has to be the best player on the team day in and day out for 7 years. He can’t disappear for 40 games. That’s insane.

That’s what he sighed up for with his contract.

100 points per year MINIMUM for 7 years straight. Hard stop. Anything else is a bad contract. God forbid anybody expect that from him.
lol has a single player even done that in the last 20 years? Mackinnon has over 100 points twice in 12 years. I’ll take one cup 😂
 

Bobby9

Registered User
Feb 10, 2019
2,434
3,347
lol has a single player even done that in the last 20 years? Mackinnon has over 100 points twice in 12 years. I’ll take one cup 😂
We’re getting zero cups of our highest paid player is not scoring 100 points.

You can get away with a 4-5-6 M dollar going on cold stretches. You can’t win with an almost 12M dollar disappearing for half a year
 

thecupismine

Registered User
Apr 1, 2007
2,694
2,083
Now five more games of data:

- Still zero bursts in the top category.
- Six more in the middle category (14 in 14 to 20 in 19).
- 30 more in the lowest category (7 per game in his first 14, 6 per game since).

Play has improved but his top end speed still looks the same. Obviously not holding him back but will be interesting to follow as the season goes on.

One interesting thing I’ve noticed is that he’s not flying down the wing anymore on rushes. Rather, he looks to be sticking to playing down the middle during the breakouts and focusing on facilitating the rush vs carrying it on his own.

Curious if it’s a physical limitation or seeing that his new linemates need a facilitator more so than a carrier, or a combination of both.

Regardless, has been really good to see him actively engaged again. This is what people were talking about when wanting him to elevate his linemates - he’s clearly putting Sherwood and Debrusk in positions to succeed, and his defensive awareness on top of that has allowed them to tilt the ice significantly.

If they get this version of Petey as the rest of the team gets healthier and (hopefully) figures out the power play, he puts them in a position to contend.
 

geebster

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 26, 2019
2,082
3,239
He’s doing better than he was over the last 8 months but he still is not justifying his cap hit.

He’s the 5th highest player in the NHL. He has to be the best player on the team day in and day out for 7 years. He can’t disappear for 40 games. That’s insane.

That’s what he sighed up for with his contract.

100 points per year MINIMUM for 7 years straight. Hard stop. Anything else is a bad contract. God forbid anybody expect that from him.
As a percent of cap at time of contract starting, Pettersson is the 21st highest paid player in the league. Actual dollar amount is not meaningful in a cap era.

Being outside the top 20 in cap burden when signed is about right, if not an underpayment. Also the minimum expectation you are putting is for him to do something only one player has ever done, so... maybe a bit unreasonable (to put it mildly).

Incidentally, if you think he should have 100 points even when he's no longer going to be a top 20 contract in raw dollars 7 years from now just because he is top 5 now, then you don't seem to have a consistent standard at all.
 

Billy Kvcmu

Registered User
Dec 5, 2014
28,630
17,416
West Vancouver
May as well move the team because they traded a 90 point Centre for an 80 point winger. Now I've heard it all. And I was not advocating this trade but your post has to be sarcasm and I'm just not picking it up. Tkachuk is NOT a complimentary player.

You're obviously too young to remember Vaive and Derlago for Tiger or Cam Neely and a 1st for Barry Pederson.
Well yes, I’m too young to remember trade that happened before I was born

Also I wasnt being sarcastic, I think Brady is being played out of his depth on a bad team and he’s just overrated because of his brother and the fact like he’s physical.

Btw, I’m going to cherry pick here, EP is less than 2 years removed from a 100 pts season. Trading a 100pts center for a 80 pts winger is a terrible move
 

Billy Kvcmu

Registered User
Dec 5, 2014
28,630
17,416
West Vancouver
He's doing better no doubt about it. But he still is extremely reluctant to shoot, I counted three times where he had a solid chance to shoot and ended up passing (and nothing really of consequences resulted). Also he still has difficulty getting open on the PP ( yesterday on our first PP unit even with Boeser, Miller and Hughes gone, he was not getting the puck much, with it being left with Garland to direct shots at the net). So happy he is doing better but still has a ways to go I feel.
I think the PP thing is just coaching decision, Tocchet runs P1 and he loves his point shot and tip in
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad