Proposal: EDM-UTA -CGY

TFHockey

The CEO of 7-8-0
May 16, 2014
7,194
4,565
Edmonton
:flames

Tij Iginla (LW) (6th OA 2024 draft)

:Utah

Matt Savoie (C)
1st Round pick (EDM, 2026) -no protection
1st Round pick (EDM, 2027) -no protection
2nd round pick (EDM, 2025)

:edmonton
Mackenzie Weegar (RHD, $5.75 Million AAV X4)
1 Million retained by Utah

This assumes Weegar will waive for Edmonton and E. Kane remains on the LTIR for the remainder of the season. Admittedly, big assumptions.

Calgary wanted to draft Tij and as I understand it pretty badly. Utah beat them to it. It's tough to come up with a three team trade and make a proposal that is fair for all sides.

Edit: Some have argued the Oilers are giving up too much in this deal. If Savoie is removed, do we feel this is fairer?
 
Last edited:

Jumptheshark

Rebooting myself
Oct 12, 2003
100,938
14,812
Somewhere on Uranus
:flames

Tij Iginla (LW) (6th OA 2024 draft)

:Utah

Matt Savoie (C)
1st Round pick (EDM, 2026) -no protection
1st Round pick (EDM, 2027) -no protection
2nd round pick (EDM, 2025)

:edmonton
Mackenzie Weegar (RHD, $5.75 Million AAV X4)
1 Million retained by Utah

This assumes Weegar will waive for Edmonton and E. Kane remains on the LTIR for the remainder of the season. Admittedly, big assumptions.

Calgary wanted to draft Tij and as I understand it pretty badly. Utah beat them to it. It's tough to come up with a three team trade and make a proposal that is fair for all sides.
Oilers go polite no

You can remove the oilers from the deal
 

TFHockey

The CEO of 7-8-0
May 16, 2014
7,194
4,565
Edmonton
That's absurd no team is giving that many first for weeger plus a blue chip.

I assume that those picks end up being late 1sts.

I also assume Weegar isn't sticking around for a rebuild in Calgary.

Good point though, if you feel that is an overpay.
 

DomBarr

Registered User
Apr 7, 2014
2,863
987
:flames

Tij Iginla (LW) (6th OA 2024 draft)

:Utah

Matt Savoie (C)
1st Round pick (EDM, 2026) -no protection
1st Round pick (EDM, 2027) -no protection
2nd round pick (EDM, 2025)

:edmonton
Mackenzie Weegar (RHD, $5.75 Million AAV X4)
1 Million retained by Utah

This assumes Weegar will waive for Edmonton and E. Kane remains on the LTIR for the remainder of the season. Admittedly, big assumptions.

Calgary wanted to draft Tij and as I understand it pretty badly. Utah beat them to it. It's tough to come up with a three team trade and make a proposal that is fair for all sides.
:cool: as a Flames fan I would just trade Weegar with $1M retained direct to Edmonton for Savoie, the 2 unprotected 1sts, and the 2nd.

Oilers go polite no

You can remove the oilers from the deal
Except its a proposal originated by an Oilers fan OR maybe a Utah fan who dislikes but doesn't hate the Oilers and Flames
 

waitin425

Registered User
Jan 10, 2009
8,144
12,257
Canada
wtf-joe-pesci.gif
 

TFHockey

The CEO of 7-8-0
May 16, 2014
7,194
4,565
Edmonton
:cool: as a Flames fan I would just trade Weegar with $1M retained direct to Edmonton for Savoie, the 2 unprotected 1sts, and the 2nd.


Except its a proposal originated by an Oilers fan OR maybe a Utah fan who dislikes but doesn't hate the Oilers and Flames

Oiler fan here.

I see the 1sts and in the 30s. So really, late late 1sts. I don't value those the way I do a good NHL player.

maybe a fairer trade would drop Matt Savoie out of the equation?

This is an all in trade, the kind I hope to see the Oilers make when going for the Cup this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Czechboy

Czechboy

Češi do toho!
Apr 15, 2018
27,295
24,533
I like the thinking... we need a RHD that is a legit top 4. Hoping Bowman can pull of some kind of a trade for a RHD and go all in during the season. Happy to lose prospects. Happy to lose picks. Happy to lose certain roster players. Get us a RHD... Weegar would be a good target.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TFHockey

LTIR

Registered User
Nov 8, 2013
27,590
14,802
:cool: as a Flames fan I would just trade Weegar with $1M retained direct to Edmonton for Savoie, the 2 unprotected 1sts, and the 2nd.


Except its a proposal originated by an Oilers fan OR maybe a Utah fan who dislikes but doesn't hate the Oilers and Flames
Ahh that changes things.
Lol @ one Oil fan

Remove Savoie and it's close.
 

DomBarr

Registered User
Apr 7, 2014
2,863
987
Ahh that changes things.
Lol @ one Oil fan

Remove Savoie and it's close.
no as a Flames fan, Savoie, 2 1sts and a 2nd is exactly what the Flames should want as a return to get them to think about moving Weegar with retention.
 

LTIR

Registered User
Nov 8, 2013
27,590
14,802
no as a Flames fan, Savoie, 2 1sts and a 2nd is exactly what the Flames should want as a return to get them to think about moving Weegar with retention.
In that case lol @ flames fan
 

DomBarr

Registered User
Apr 7, 2014
2,863
987
In that case lol @ flames fan
the Flames are not looking to move Weegar so to get them interested in moving them the offer has to blow their doors off. 2 1sts and a 2nd doesn't do it.
 

ESH

Registered User
Jun 19, 2011
5,409
3,597
The part that bugs me about this proposal is that the valuations make no sense. Do you really think Tij Iginla, MacKenzie Weegar, and 3 1st round picks are all equal in value?
 

Jumptheshark

Rebooting myself
Oct 12, 2003
100,938
14,812
Somewhere on Uranus
I like how the oilers are given up the equivalent of 3 first rounders and in the other thread it is only 1 for the Canucks

 

LTIR

Registered User
Nov 8, 2013
27,590
14,802
the Flames are not looking to move Weegar so to get them interested in moving them the offer has to blow their doors off. 2 1sts and a 2nd doesn't do it.
You are right . A cap dump would also need to go to CGY along with multiple 1sts + 2nd.
A deal similar to Ekholm from STL to EDM
 
  • Like
Reactions: VainGretzky

TFHockey

The CEO of 7-8-0
May 16, 2014
7,194
4,565
Edmonton
That's insane pronger didn't return that but weeger will lol

The part that bugs me about this proposal is that the valuations make no sense. Do you really think Tij Iginla, MacKenzie Weegar, and 3 1st round picks are all equal in value?

Well, like I said, I expect these firsts to be in the 30-32 range.

If Weegar wants out of Calgary, and he may if he doesn't want to stick around for a rebuild, Tij Iginla is a forward the Flames would want to target.

I suppose if the Oilers take out Matt Savoie it could be fairer, sure. I am not sure what they have in him yet.

The extra 2nd is for retention on Utah's part. It is for four years after all.

I don't see the Oilers and the Flames dealing directly with one another in a big trade. I think Utah has the forward Calgary wants, and the Flames have the RHD the Oilers want.
 

DomBarr

Registered User
Apr 7, 2014
2,863
987
That's insane pronger didn't return that but weeger will lol
I don;t disagree that it would be an insane return for Weegar what makes it more insane is that the OP had that return going to UTAH who only gave up Tij Iginla. I just cut out Utah and said if that was what was offered for Weegar then the Flames would take it over Iginla.

but Pronger definitely returned more

Smid was a 2004 7th OA pick so he would be approx. equal to Savoie
2 1sts = 2 1sts
a 2nd = a 2nd

then what puts Pronger deal at more valuable is Lupal who was drafted 7th OA in 2002 and just scored 28 goals as a rookie for the ducks.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad