Kane is a cap dump for us. If he gets surgery and comes back fine, he'd be an okay addition to the forward. If not, LTIRetire. He might do well enough to get flipped at the next year TDL.
After this year, IIRC, Karlsson's actual salary takes a big hit too. Many of us suspect he will be a good trade target to a team looking to compete once he's on his final year and the signing bonus has been paid.
Given what he can still do offensively, I think that evens out the questionable defensive side but that brings up an interesting point - what are you wanting? If you want a PPQB and PMD on the 2RD, he's your man. Pair him with defensively responsible guy and have at it. Pettersson-Karlsson is regularly our best pairing. I would imagine in a better defensive system surround by better players, the highlights on defensive lapses would go down.
I don't think a trade with major retention would necessarily be off the table but I think you have bridge a gap in "missed value" that we might not get if we can't retain on a guy like Pettersson. We have used 2 retention slots and have 1 left. If this was next year when the other two open up, it would be different. So this year, it's a little tougher for us which is why I recommended what I did.
I'm not sure if Dubas is looking to recover from the trade necessarily. A big part of that trade was dumping a bunch of guys that didn't fit with the Penguins - Granlund, Petry, Rutta, CDS. So part of the trade was paying to get rid of some crap.
Yes that would be the exact bet I'm making. That in a better defensive system (Knoblauch is a defensive wizard as a Coach) surrounded by a team that's bought in, EK65's defensive warts can be lessened. Nurse-Karlsson would be the pairing, and I think Nurse can be a better stand-in for Pettersson in that role. Although Pettersson is a good defensive D too and still their metrics are pretty bad defensively.
On Petterson, I think $4M is appropriate for what he brings. If a team wants a Top 4 Left hand D, that price point isn't out of the ball park. If you take a Cap dump in, teams can likely fit him in without retention. With retention slots free-ing up next year, it may not be as much a hurdle as you think.
On the original Karlsson deal that's how I saw it too. You dumped a bunch of bad cap hits on the Sharks who Grier hopes to revive and get value for. If those cap dumps can then be parlayed in 1st Round Pick(s) and Prospect(s), Dubas would be ahead.
So let's take a look at the original deal in a nutshell:
Pittsburgh sent:
2024 first-round pick
Mikael Granlund (2x$5M Cap Dump)
Jan Rutta (2x$2.75M Cap Dump)
Mike Hoffman (1x$4.75 Cap Dump)
2025 Second-round pick to Montreal
Legare to Montreal (Nothing prospect)
DeSmith to Montreal (Backup Goalie)
Pittsburgh got EK65 @ $10M + Third Round Pick + Pitlick (Nothing Prospect) + Hamuliak (Nothing Prospect).
I would offer for EK65 @ $5M:
2026 first-round pick (From the Oilers)
2025 second-round pick (From the Blues)
2025 third-round pick (From the Blues)
Beau Akey (Good Trending 2nd Round Pick Prospect)
Troy Stecher (Decent RH 3rd Pair PMD)
And for the retention, based on the costs to dump Walman and Ceci this year, an additional:
2026 second-round pick (From the Oilers)
2026 third-round pick (From the Oilers)
Dubas comes out way ahead in his Rebuild and gets a bit for a retool too.
*I should add, I do not represent the general interests of the Oilers fanbase, I get mostly laughed at for my interest in EK65, with most thinking he's too much of a defensive liability to be relied on in the playoffs. I believe in Karlsson though, so thus the pretty sizeable offer IMO*