Confirmed with Link: [EDM/SJS] Jake Walman <--> cond. EDM 1st '26 (Top-12 protected) & Carl Berglund

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
The way Knob/Coffey like to mix and match their dmen I wouldn’t worry too much about who his “regular” partner is, I fully expect he’ll be coming in with around 20 min a night with multiple different partners. It would also probably be a good thing to cut back on Ekholm’s minutes a bit as he’s been struggling lately, gotta wonder how the long run last summer is affecting him being that he’s coming up on 35 shortly.
Plus he's been sick and his wife got injured skiing and is a bit laid up so he's probably on full-time dad mode with his 3 kids these days haha
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oilhawks
3rd pairing Dmen dont have 20 min or more TOI.

In his last 2 years with Detroit Walman had around 20 mins TOI
In San Jose he had just over 23 min TOI.
He has been getting better each season in the NHL...looks like a late bloomer to me.

At this point in time he appears to be a top 4 dman...at least on the left side.

In no way is he a "3rd pairing dman". Whoever suggests that has clearly never watched him. (Or even looked at his stat line?)

I watched a ton of Walman this year; he's an absolute steal for you guys. He moves very well, and was top dman in SJ by a mile.
 
Is this a left shot guy who can actually play the right side. Or is this a left shot guy that "can play the right side." Looking at his d partners over the last few years it seems like he's almost exclusively played on the left side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDoused
Hope not, I was thinking he be signed to replace Wanner next year.
Agree, though Munzenberger is a lefty while Wanner is right handed. He's undervalued within a brutal program and generally solid shutdown role who kept his head above water. Was wondering if San Jose might look d prospect over a forward. I would for a deep rebuild team.
 
Walman is 8th on the Sharks in GA/60 5x5 (3.22) 7th in HDGA/60 (1.43) and 9th in On Ice Sv% (89.2), this would be last on the Oilers except Dineen.

Yeah the Sharks are bad and maybe he’s played a pair higher than he should, but that’s a bit scary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McHelpus and TKB21
You have no clue who the player is. Majority the posts in this thread are a joke
Take it easy sport, I would be looking for a larger fish to spend my 1st on then this player. Hard to say if that player is on the market from sitting on my couch but getting another Ekholm level defender for a larger package is what I would be looking for.
 
Walman is 8th on the Sharks in GA/60 5x5 (3.22) 7th in HDGA/60 (1.43) and 9th in On Ice Sv% (89.2), this would be last on the Oilers except Dineen.

Yeah the Sharks are bad and maybe he’s played a pair higher than he should, but that’s a bit scary.
He's played 60% of his even strength time with Ceci. And of course those numbers would be last place on a much better team, he was playing huge minutes on a bad team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nally
Oilers likely want to run:
Ekholm-Bouchard
Nurse-Kulak
Walman-Emberson

So he'll be left side
Planning for Kulak in the top 4 is a plan to fail come playoff time. He's not a top 4 d-man. He had a good start to the season and has had some nice moments. But he gets scored against too much.
 
Is this a left shot guy who can actually play the right side. Or is this a left shot guy that "can play the right side." Looking at his d partners over the last few years it seems like he's almost exclusively played on the left side.
Hes the lefty, Kulak will be a right sider
 
And yet Ceci has better numbers in all three categories.
They were paired for most of the season. Walman got more offensive situational play and Ceci skewed heavily to the goal suppression side and PK. Both had huge minutes, toi and total minutes on a largely overwhelmed team. Should drop fairly well into middle pair or third pair responsibilities and competition.
 

Ad

Ad