SupremeTeam16
5-14-6-1
Edmonton doesn’t need another 5M+ winger long term.
They should save that 2nd and the cap space to try and upgrade the D.
They should save that 2nd and the cap space to try and upgrade the D.
Anderson has more value to the Habs than JP would because of his style and he doesn't hurt us. Lots of cap space is becoming available next season for us. Could JP turn it around. Sure players have . Could St Louis bring him around? If he could it would become a steal for us. But if he can't we're better off in keeping Anderson.Only in mtl imagination land.
Anderson doesn't have value, just like JP.
The Habs traded a 22 year old Romanov for a 21 year old Dach, knowing they had several D prospects (Guhle, Harris, Xhekaj) ready to graduate to the NHL and replace the young defenseman. Meanwhile, they lacked depth at center. How is that a tank move?guhle and xhekaj are rookies, who never suited up in the nhl before this season.
the romanov trade was a tanker move.
this is a narrative that isn't true. JP very smart player, his positional play is outstanding and is phenomenal at breaking up transitions and forechecking. his issue is his finishing is far below averagePuljujarvi has low hockey IQ. I don't know why we should consider this?
I love the in depth description of puljujarvi - as if Anderson doesn’t falter from the exact same downfall.Puljujarvi has low hockey IQ. I don't know why we should consider this?
both have similar issues. Anderson has the intimidation and protector angle. Habs don't' make this trade.I love the in depth description of puljujarvi - as if Anderson doesn’t falter from the exact same downfall.
to get rid of the anderson contract.
No way. Puljujarvi is a bust and Habs not giving up Anderson for a 2nd. Canadiens had huge trade offer for Anderson last deadlineMtl: Jesse Puljujarvi + 2nd pick
Edm: Anderson
With the loss of Kane, Anderson would a great fit on the top two lines. Puljujarvi will get a new start with Mtl.
Because you get out of a nearly negative value contract and you get a 2nd round pick. I'd rather just let JP go after the season is over and have the cap space.Puljujarvi has low hockey IQ. I don't know why we should consider this?
No way. Puljujarvi is a bust and Habs not giving up Anderson for a 2nd. Canadiens had huge trade offer for Anderson last deadline
Puljujarvi has low hockey IQ. I don't know why we should consider this?
this is a narrative that isn't true. JP very smart player, his positional play is outstanding and is phenomenal at breaking up transitions and forechecking. his issue is his finishing is far below average
assists would be part of finishing.. so of course he's not raking in the assists lolSo he must be raking in the assists right? no? Howsabout hits? He must be plastering guys and being a threat right? no?
So basically he's a non-physical 4th liner who gets paid what? 3per? I wonder why my fellow Habs aren't falling over themselves to get him plus a 2nd for our sole power forward type.
Here's my counter-offer: Puljujarvi for Hoffman. You guys get a Winger that can finish for your great Centres, we get out from under Hoff's 2nd year. The moment we get JP we shove him down to the A and if we're lucky someone grabs him on waivers on his way down.
Fine .Some of us would rather keep Anderson because he would help us a lot more than JP.Because you get out of a nearly negative value contract and you get a 2nd round pick. I'd rather just let JP go after the season is over and have the cap space.
That's fair. Anderson is a better player than JP is. The cap structures for the two teams are very different. We can't add another 5.5M forward long term. At least not right now, especially when we are only giving up 3M. It just doesn't work, and even if Anderson isn't a negative hit to you guys, it just isn't a fit. Especially when we have more gaping holes in our roster than the middle six wing. Something around JP for Joel Edmundson makes more sense from our side, although that's crossing dangerously into another discussion on this board right now, and still don't think the two fanbases would agree on value. Nor do I think trading Edmundson for a forward and a pick is the right move for you guys, so...yeah. I don't think the pieces line up perfectly between the two teams right now.Fine .Some of us would rather keep Anderson because he would help us a lot more than JP.
This seems just about right.That's fair. Anderson is a better player than JP is. The cap structures for the two teams are very different. We can't add another 5.5M forward long term. At least not right now, especially when we are only giving up 3M. It just doesn't work, and even if Anderson isn't a negative hit to you guys, it just isn't a fit. Especially when we have more gaping holes in our roster than the middle six wing. Something around JP for Joel Edmundson makes more sense from our side, although that's crossing dangerously into another discussion on this board right now, and still don't think the two fanbases would agree on value. Nor do I think trading Edmundson for a forward and a pick is the right move for you guys, so...yeah. I don't think the pieces line up perfectly between the two teams right now.
It never was released. But it was reported to make Hughes think. Even though Anderson wasn't available. I highly doubt Montreal moves Anderson. He's on pace for 25 goals, one of toughest guys in game. Locked up long term. Anderson provides physicality for Montreal young finesse players. Gorton got burnt with Wilson incident in NY not having a tough guy in his lineup. He admitted it was a mistake. Said he'll never repeat itYet he's still a Hab? What was this "HUGE" offer anyways?
It never was released. But it was reported to make Hughes think. Even though Anderson wasn't available. I highly doubt Montreal moves Anderson. He's on pace for 25 goals, one of toughest guys in game. Locked up long term. Anderson provides physicality for Montreal young finesse players. Gorton got burnt with Wilson incident in NY not having a tough guy in his lineup. He admitted it was a mistake. Said he'll never repeat it
We see it totally different. Reaves is totally different. Anderson is goal scorer along with tough guy. You way offRags went and got Reaves and now he’s a regular healthy scratch. I’m not sold that Anderson is worth his contract but on the flip side if I was Montreal I won’t move him either cause honestly for a contender it would require either retention or a bad contract going back and for sure he is a rare player and Montreal is a young club. I see the value in Montreal keeping him.
The on pace for goals means less than you are implying. He’s 28 and topped 20 goals once in his career year. Outside that season he’s never surpassed 32 points. Yeah many games missed, that’s no selling feature either way. It’s hard to honestly justify the cap hit vs production if you look at the full picture and from both Montreal and the acquiring teams perspective. As far as a hockey deal it would take a bad GM to pay full value in a hockey trade.
As for the Wilson incident post lockout we’ve seen this situation what, twice. Wilson vs NY and Lucic vs Buffalo. Outliers and you don’t need to spend 5.5m for a guy willing to throw knuckles to keep the opposition honest. If anything having a guy seen as a top 6 playing that role sucks as that’s a role of a 4th liner.