Proposal: EDM-DET

TCNorthstars

Registered User
Jan 5, 2009
4,348
1,869
Lansing area, MI
Apparently you have one fan



Great! ESPN has Pronman. No one here is going to claim they are a great source for hockey. Bleacherreport gets oft quoted by TSN, ESPN, THN, and other respected sources, doesn't mean that they are a trove of insight on average. Even Hockeybuzz gets talked about by respected people, doesn't mean its the bible. Just because a broken clock is right twice a day doesn't mean its the best source for keeping time. Same goes for your site.

The Athletic has Pronman.
 

LastWordArmy

Registered User
Sep 11, 2011
9,081
3,631
Canada
Apparently you have one fan

Great! ESPN has Pronman. No one here is going to claim they are a great source for hockey. Bleacherreport gets oft quoted by TSN, ESPN, THN, and other respected sources, doesn't mean that they are a trove of insight on average. Even Hockeybuzz gets talked about by respected people, doesn't mean its the bible. Just because a broken clock is right twice a day doesn't mean its the best source for keeping time. Same goes for your site.

You can't please all of the people all of the time, but we seem to be pleasing enough of them.

You aren't a fan, and that's fine, everyone is entitled to their opinion. But if you are going to post things like you have about us, I'm going to defend my site and my writers.

I'll let the readers of HF make the choice about what they think about your opinion. Enough in here have critiqued your opinion of Athanasiou that I think I'll let your opinions of our site and articles stand for themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedMenace

Shaman464

No u
May 1, 2009
10,474
4,593
Boston, MA
You can't please all of the people all of the time, but we seem to be pleasing enough of them.

You aren't a fan, and that's fine, everyone is entitled to their opinion. But if you are going to post things like you have about us, I'm going to defend my site and my writers.

I'll let the readers of HF make the choice about what they think about your opinion. Enough in here have critiqued your opinion of Athanasiou that I think I'll let your opinions of our site and articles stand for themselves.

Yes, a few vocal people are critiqued my views of AA, but most of the outrage is that I believe that Detroit's prospect pool is thin on elite talent.
 

SirloinUB

Registered User
Aug 20, 2010
4,945
2,503
Canada
Yes, a few vocal people are critiqued my views of AA, but most of the outrage is that I believe that Detroit's prospect pool is thin on elite talent.

I'm definitely not "outraged" but I have asked you for a source that backs up your opinion that we have a weak prospect system. You still haven't delivered.
 

Shaman464

No u
May 1, 2009
10,474
4,593
Boston, MA
I'm definitely not "outraged" but I have asked you for a source that backs up your opinion that we have a weak prospect system. You still haven't delivered.

Got a little side tracked with all the other comments. Let me ask you, what makes you think its strong? Who are the blue chip prospects? What positions are they strong on? Are they sufficient to fill major holes on the team? Most sources praise the depth of the pool, but have very little to say about potential elite talent outside of Zadina. Given the state of the Red Wings, the number of years out of contention, etc. the prospect pool isn't that strong.
 

SirloinUB

Registered User
Aug 20, 2010
4,945
2,503
Canada
Got a little side tracked with all the other comments. Let me ask you, what makes you think its strong? Who are the blue chip prospects? What positions are they strong on? Are they sufficient to fill major holes on the team? Most sources praise the depth of the pool, but have very little to say about potential elite talent outside of Zadina. Given the state of the Red Wings, the number of years out of contention, etc. the prospect pool isn't that strong.

I've provided a source that leads me to disagree with your claim of "the wings having a weak prospect pool and core". As I said, I'd reconsider my opinion with new information but I'm still waiting for you to step up.

The ball is in your court pal.
 

The Red Line

Registered User
Oct 11, 2010
8,600
5,083
Apparently you have one fan



Great! ESPN has Pronman. No one here is going to claim they are a great source for hockey. Bleacherreport gets oft quoted by TSN, ESPN, THN, and other respected sources, doesn't mean that they are a trove of insight on average. Even Hockeybuzz gets talked about by respected people, doesn't mean its the bible. Just because a broken clock is right twice a day doesn't mean its the best source for keeping time. Same goes for your site.
Wasn't saying anything about the blog, was saying that I don't believe you "hate to be an a******" The part that is bolded in the original quote...
 

LastWordArmy

Registered User
Sep 11, 2011
9,081
3,631
Canada
Got a little side tracked with all the other comments. Let me ask you, what makes you think its strong? Who are the blue chip prospects? What positions are they strong on? Are they sufficient to fill major holes on the team? Most sources praise the depth of the pool, but have very little to say about potential elite talent outside of Zadina. Given the state of the Red Wings, the number of years out of contention, etc. the prospect pool isn't that strong.

They are ranked between 9 - 15 by every source that was posted in this thread. So middle of the pack (or just a little above middle of the pack).

I'm not sure anyone is saying that they are elite, but I don't see anyone saying they are crap either.

How many teams out there have more than one "elite" prospect, at the level of Zadina. Its not many, and those teams would have been ranked above Detroit in team rankings.... thats why the Wings weren't seen as an organization with elite prospect depth. They still have a good group though, with players like Cholowski, Rasmussen, Hronek, Veleno, Berggren, McIsaac, Filip Larsson. They may not be blue chip or elite prospects... the type of player who is almost guaranteed to be on a top line, or top defence pair, but not many teams have multiple players like that. They have a good number of prospects who are good and have a chance to be great if they develop. You have to think when you have 6 skater prospects like that... 1-2 will develop into top 6 or top 4, 2-3 will bust and be out of the league quickly, and 2-3 will become 3rd pair/bottom six players. Then the goalie, thats voodoo but he looks good in the NCAA.
 

Richard Menzel

Registered User
Jan 23, 2019
146
13
AA would require Oilers 1st round pick or Bouchard. Those are the only two assets that make sense.

Bear is not a commodity worth trading a top 6 forward for.

AA is not being traded... neither is larkin, mantha, Hronek, Cholowski or Zadina. The WINGS are rebuilding not giving away their youth!! People can't seem to get this straight!!
 

Shaman464

No u
May 1, 2009
10,474
4,593
Boston, MA
AA is not being traded... neither is larkin, mantha, Hronek, Cholowski or Zadina. The WINGS are rebuilding not giving away their youth!! People can't seem to get this straight!!

Teams that do the best make trades from places of strength to acquire players that they need. The Wings have Ras, Zadina, Mantha, Bert, Nyquist, and many other young players that can fill the role of a top 9 wing. Trading a player like AA for a defender makes more sense than having a ton of good wingers but no defense or centers.
 

Richard Menzel

Registered User
Jan 23, 2019
146
13
I didn’t say they would. I said I don’t think Athanasiou is near compelling enough to get Bouchard from the Oilers.

I have news for all the Oilers fans that think Bouchard is god's gift... he had a bad World juniors and a poor first season overall. Long ways to go, that is why they are called prospects!!
 

Seachd

Registered User
Mar 16, 2002
25,249
9,881
I have news for all the Oilers fans that think Bouchard is god's gift... he had a bad World juniors and a poor first season overall. Long ways to go, that is why they are called prospects!!

He definitely has not had a poor season, but regardless... how is this at all relevant to the conversation?
 

Richard Menzel

Registered User
Jan 23, 2019
146
13
Got a little side tracked with all the other comments. Let me ask you, what makes you think its strong? Who are the blue chip prospects? What positions are they strong on? Are they sufficient to fill major holes on the team? Most sources praise the depth of the pool, but have very little to say about potential elite talent outside of Zadina. Given the state of the Red Wings, the number of years out of contention, etc. the prospect pool isn't that strong.

Veleno, Hronek and Cholowski is a decent start. Did you forget it takes a while for these drafted young kids to develop. It is only rare when a team is lucky enough to draft a Crosby, Ovechkin, Mathews, Dahlin, etc... It just doesnt happen with any team!!
 

Richard Menzel

Registered User
Jan 23, 2019
146
13
He definitely has not had a poor season, but regardless... how is this at all relevant to the conversation?

Because all oilers fans think this kid is great. I hope he turns out to be but just like any young player they need experience and time to develop..
 

Seachd

Registered User
Mar 16, 2002
25,249
9,881
Because all oilers fans think this kid is great. I hope he turns out to be but just like any young player they need experience and time to develop..

Yes, that's fine. Like every other high pick. That doesn't mean they don't have incredible value, obviously.
 

masta8

Registered User
Apr 26, 2018
355
94
Actually your entire post history in here is a disaster. Also: nobody is outraged
Yeah Oilers fans, Shaman guy has been on the anti- AA train since I have joined the forum... I think he has had bad history with a Greek or something.... but I'm a wings fan and have been a big fan of AA since we drafted him. It would take a lot imo to acquire him that I would say would have to include bouchard or a 1st round pick this year or next. I think AA can be a bonafide 30 goal guy in this league because of his elite speed.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad