Bruce Curlock does a 15 thoughtful breakdown, and it is closer than it looks, but the Oilers still won right now
It's a great read.
Bruce Curlock does a 15 thoughtful breakdown, and it is closer than it looks, but the Oilers still won right now
Yes yes you have mentioned his PK and zone entries. He won’t be missed. One of the biggest passengers of the playoffs.Just saying you can't count chickens yet. What the Oilers lose this season is an actual NHL player that was very good on pk, low event player, responsible 200ft player and good at zone entries, zone exits and TKA. McLeod played a lot of parts here and was versatile as well. But he had an important speed ingredient to game that the team will miss.
I'm only looking at this in one year window because in my view that is our compete window. Savoie won't be in our NHL lineup.
Savoie has had recurring shoulder injuries and hasn't even played against men yet. Thats a potential worry to be having that problem so young, and in Junior hockey.
Bruce Curlock does a 15 thoughtful breakdown, and it is closer than it looks, but the Oilers still won right now
they were gonna lose an "actual NHL player" anyways due to cap constraints (still have to shed salary)Just saying you can't count chickens yet. What the Oilers lose this season is an actual NHL player that was very good on pk, low event player, responsible 200ft player and good at zone entries, zone exits and TKA. McLeod played a lot of parts here and was versatile as well. But he had an important speed ingredient to game that the team will miss.
I'm only looking at this in one year window because in my view that is our compete window. Savoie won't be in our NHL lineup.
Savoie has had recurring shoulder injuries and hasn't even played against men yet. Thats a potential worry to be having that problem so young, and in Junior hockey.
Yes yes you have mentioned his PK and zone entries. He won’t be missed. One of the biggest passengers of the playoffs.
What reoccurring shoulder injury? Please explain where you got this from… he got his shoulder injury playing against men.
Possible to get a summary. No longer allowed to look at threads without an account and don't care to make one after my old on.It's a great read.
What is? I don't see any actual article or breakdown. Just people responding to a post on X. With those respondents not seeing a source article either. Where is it?It's a great read.
What is? I don't see any actual article or breakdown. Just people responding to a post on X. With those respondents not seeing a source article either. Where is it?
It's called a thread. 15 part post thread to be exact, and it's a great read.What is? I don't see any actual article or breakdown. Just people responding to a post on X. With those respondents not seeing a source article either. Where is it?
Lolz I remember Nuge had that too, and then never had since.
Recurring shoulder injuries. One of them happened in prospects camp game.
The player has had 3mins in one game in the NHL and a few games even at AHL level.
Some reports Sabres may have moved on due to the injury history. Not sure if its bs but its out there.
Matthew Savoie's injury woes influence Sabres' trade decision to Oilers: Report
The Edmonton Oilers have acquired WHL forward Matthew Savoie from the Buffalo Sabres.www.sportskeeda.com
I really think you are looking at this the wrong way.Just saying you can't count chickens yet. What the Oilers lose this season is an actual NHL player that was very good on pk, low event player, responsible 200ft player and good at zone entries, zone exits and TKA. McLeod played a lot of parts here and was versatile as well. But he had an important speed ingredient to game that the team will miss.
I'm only looking at this in one year window because in my view that is our compete window. Savoie won't be in our NHL lineup.
Savoie has had recurring shoulder injuries and hasn't even played against men yet. Thats a potential worry to be having that problem so young, and in Junior hockey.
So your contention is Jeff Jackson just got taken to the cleaners?What is? I don't see any actual article or breakdown. Just people responding to a post on X. With those respondents not seeing a source article either. Where is it?
Haha, McLeod is gone, jk.This is the key point.
I take a week off and comeback and the board is going nuts over some kid anointing it as a hot trade.
We traded an actual NHL player, a guy that is healthy that plays every game, can play up and down the lineup, that is a big part of a pk, that has pace, is very good at zone exits and entries and goal suppression for a kid that has played 3mins in the NHL and with shoulder injury histories already this early in his career and that kid hasn't played against men yet.
Going off Savoie's scouting reports and self reports also a theme where he needs to hold and carry the puck more, is the player already reticent doing this? Seems odd for a producer to be a bit shy on possessing puck. At least thats whats being stated.
In anycase Sabres who have handled more prospects than us have traded the player. Theres been some suggestion, not sure if its garbage, that Sabres moved from Savoie possibly due to injury history.
In anycase Savoie hasn't even played in AHL much to this point. He's an unknown even at AHL level. People here talking as if he's already a shoe in with the Oilers in the NHL.
Bird in hand used to be the rule.
I doubt Hamblin splits anything other than an injury call-upAs other posters have said, I think Hamblin takes the 4c spot (or splits with Ryan)
I thought he played great in that role this year and (imho) is a MUCH better fit at that particular role than McLeod could ever be.
Yeah, Hamblin isn’t the guy to go up and down the lineup, but a physical, trenches, “give a shit meter” to me is what a 4C is all about.
Love it if he grabs the spot.
This to me would be great without getting anything back, but to get this blue chip prospect? When we don’t even have to rush him in the lineup? AND still hasn’t started the 3 year ELC?
Great trade, we won’t miss Clouder at all, and have a great chance of a hit prospect.
AND clear cap space?
Wowza.
Larsson himself was a 2nd overall pick. He was 23 years old at the time, elite shut down defenseman, signed long-term at a very good contract. Basically, a younger Ekholm.Yes in a vacuum. Considering Hall's 1OA status. But high pedigree RDs aren't easy to find either. And our team still needed that RD.
Larsson himself was a 2nd overall pick. He was 23 years old at the time, elite shut down defenseman, signed long-term at a very good contract. Basically, a younger Ekholm.
Now he is. We are talking potential in 2016. Taylor Hall is now an oft injured second liner so it is inappropriate to compare today's Larsson (who's still a solid d-man) to Ekholm.Disagree here. Ekholm is by far the better player of the two. About the same defensively but Ekholm's offensive capabilities (talent and vision) are far superior
Pretty sure he was a 4th overallLarsson himself was a 2nd overall pick. He was 23 years old at the time, elite shut down defenseman, signed long-term at a very good contract. Basically, a younger Ekholm.
Larsson gets walked as well and is getting more frequent with age, he had a poor season in Seattle this year by his standardsDisagree here. Ekholm is by far the better player of the two. About the same defensively but Ekholm's offensive capabilities (talent and vision) are far superior
Correct, he was 4th pick in RNH draft.Pretty sure he was a 4th overall
Larsson gets walked as well and is getting more frequent with age, he had a poor season in Seattle this year by his standards
How does one read it? Do I need a twatter account?Very good read...thanks for posting that.
He makes some good points in the thread, but his evidence in McLeod being "double shifted in the 3rd period of game 7" is just completely wrong. McLeod had 4 shifts in the 3rd period of game 7.It's called a thread. 15 part post thread to be exact, and it's a great read.