OilerSuperstar17
Registered User
- Oct 5, 2012
- 680
- 375
A 1-for-1
Yamamoto for Comtois
or
2-for-2
Yamamoto/Marody
for
Comtois/Groulx
Yamamoto for Comtois
or
2-for-2
Yamamoto/Marody
for
Comtois/Groulx
A 1-for-1
Yamamoto for Comtois
or
2-for-2
Yamamoto/Marody
for
Comtois/Groulx
I’d say yes to the first but would be much more interested in moving a package for Gibson
Gibson & Comtois for McDavid...
/for balance sake, we can't have only Anaheim fans saying 'get the hell out of here with that offer' in this thread, this should help even out the outrage
I do think Comtois would be fantastic in edmonton... but i also think hes 1 of the only offensive wingers we have to put on Zegras wing... and stylistically they are a really good fit together.Anaheim declines.
Comtois would be a great addition, really like his play and also how he played at the IIHF WHC this year as well.
Anaheim doesn’t do either deal, Comtois isn’t available unless he’s being used in a package to get a young, high end talent.
Not your sarcasm that’s for sure…Is today April’s first ??? Am I missing something ?
Meh comtois was our leading scorer last year…. Wouldn’t really call him a prospect…. I have a hard time putting him in potential eichel tradesI mean this is pretty much how every fan base feels about their prospects.
I agree Yammamoto isn't the main value piece in a Comtois return though.
Meh comtois was our leading scorer last year…. Wouldn’t really call him a prospect…. I have a hard time putting him in potential eichel trades