SteveCangialosi123
Registered User
None of you people are saying shit if some of these pucks are going in.Maybe watch his play.
None of you people are saying shit if some of these pucks are going in.Maybe watch his play.
Graves only got 10:23 of ice time.
Bratt was goalied by Shesterkin???? That’s some revisionist BS. I can count on one hand the number of dangerous chances he created or was a part of.
A 73 point player is not a 70 point player…like wtf?? Those three extra points put him into a different tier?
Ridiculous level of apologism.
Roughly 10:23 too much.Graves only got 10:23 of ice time.
He got hurt and went off for a stretch.Graves only got 10:23 of ice time.
So I’m a doomer because I think it might be in the team’s best interest to replace a forward that I think is too one dimensional and who’s new contract may not be a good use of limited cap space when taking into account other players that need big money?You’re right bud, the 4% on ice shooting percentage is very sustainable and exactly what we should expect from Bratt every playoff run. Your old doomer act was less annoying.
Afternoon game too for the yuckIt all comes down to sunday
They need to bring that game 3 MSG mentality
UWOTM8two games.. i actually was hoping someone would defend him. as i said incredible Numbers and he's very young. I'm not judging him other ( his effect in the team in this series only) than the possiblity of the devils repeating what they did against the rangers. i don't see it was curious if you thought what might happen. as Lindy has to think ling term but trade deadline vets are thinking now . peace..
No, it’s more the concern trolling about if our stars can do it in da playoffs as if that’s some legitimate thing to be asking about Hughes or Nico or even Timo and Bratt. No, all of these players that play different styles can’t do it. Blow it up.So I’m a doomer because I think it might be in the team’s best interest to replace a forward that I think is too one dimensional and who’s new contract may not be a good use of limited cap space when taking into account other players that need big money?
Once again…if you you say so, “bud”.
It’s more than just playoff production we are talking about . If we give Bratt 8 mil , we have zero cap to add anyine . Maybe this roster is nkt the perfect setup . I personally would prefer to use the money earmarked for Bratt on a different style olayer with different Sp attributes . We habe seen that we need a mkre interio rforward . How can we add that if we pay Bratt 8 mil. I’d rather use that to go to a olayer of a different skill set better suited for playoff hockey / can win board battles more often than not plus score .And the nameless player you’re wanking off to that will replace Bratt will magically blow pucks past Igor and this Canes team like it was nothing. Got it.
I remember a pivotal goal being scored in the biggest game the team has played in over a decade.Remember when people said the Playoff Tatar stuff was overblown? 1 point in 9 games.
I remember when people said that playoff hockey is no different than the regular season and everyone exaggerates the difference .Remember when people said the Playoff Tatar stuff was overblown? 1 point in 9 games.
I remember when posters were begging for Timo "No points in 8 playoff games" MeierI remember when people said that playoff hockey is no different than the regular season and everyone exaggerates the difference .
Even for the regular sewosn , we need to add a more interior forward or two .
Oh just stop with the over-dramatization of what’s being said. No one is talking about moving Nico or Timo. You’re throwing a tantrum because people are questioning whether we should retain Bratt, and you refuse to hear that it’s a multitude of factors playing into it not just a handful of playoff games.No, it’s more the concern trolling about if our stars can do it in da playoffs as if that’s some legitimate thing to be asking about Hughes or Nico or even Timo and Bratt. No, all of these players that play different styles can’t do it. Blow it up.