Tobias Kahun
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2017
- 46,626
- 59,170
That’s the right call in everybody’s opinion
He can't possibly have called a timeout... that makes zero sense.Why didn’t Maurice use the challenge time as a timeout??
What, he’s not gonna try and sell it??How dumb is Hathaway that he thought that should count
Apparently his players need about 5-10 minutes to regroup.He can't possibly have called a timeout... that makes zero sense.
I think he means why did he just stand there looking stern instead of coachingHe can't possibly have called a timeout... that makes zero sense.
Hahaha yesDoes Paul Maurice have...a moustache tan line?
Great shift by the bruins there. But refs looking right at that play and allowing that goal to count in the first place is laughable. I see that they are already in mid-season form lol
Sort ofI think he means why did he just stand there looking stern instead of coaching
Clifford boarded a Staal in the 1st period yet Boston fans here were cheering it.The rest of the game has been evidence as well.
The Foligno hold despite both teams constantly making similar plays. Zero consistency. McAvoy boarded immediately after.
The officials do their reputation no favor.
How is a ref looking right at that and called it a good goal on the ice.
“WACKIN THE GLOVE IS A NO-NO, OKAY?”Too bad Wes McCauley isn't reffing this game, we might get one of his great center ice calls.."you can't do that, no goal!"
Aww look at that. I triggered a delicate soul.Wish it counted just for that
Clifford boarded a Staal in the 1st period yet Boston fans here were cheering it.