Here's my 2 cents on the officiating and why I think while we MIGHT have gotten the benefit, it's not as one sided as everyone thinks. I won't bring up bad calls against the Rangers, or missed calls against the Caps. I will however, try to use logic.
If it's a conspiracy:
1) Ovechkin is EASILY the biggest name in this series. He's probably the 2nd biggest name post-lockout having a resurgent Richard season. I fail to see why the league would want the Rangers through. Yes, NY is the largest city and the biggest TV Market in America (just going by size of the DMA, the market region tracked by Nielsen). Washington however is a large one itself, #8. If we're going by hockey markets then it definitely is a bigger one than larger DMAs. I'd bet they're definitely bigger than LA and Dallas. Most likely San Jose too, which is part of the San Francisco DMA. So it's top 5 most when you account for DMA and hockey interest. Now Pittsburgh is a bigger hockey market but a far smaller DMA. It's not perfect. There's also Canadian teams. Just trying to show that Washington is a big market. Besides, I'm not sure if the market the team PLAYS in is as important as the national audience. I have no numbers to back it up, but I would think casual fans in other cities would rather tune in to see the best goal scorer in the league than the best goalie in the league.
If it's incompetence:
2) This is a bit harder. The PPs HAVE been out of whack. Incompetence pretty much means that the refs are not biased but are RANDOMLY helping the Rangers because they suck. So let's first take out game 1. I think even most Caps fans would think that that game was fair towards the Caps. More PPs for the Caps. The most they've had in any game in the series (5). So, did the Caps get hosed in the last 5 games? On a subjective basis, what does it mean that a team is getting hosed? Pretty much there are bad penalties called against them AND there are bad missed calls against the other team (I guess you can have one or the other, but seems Caps fans are calling for both). Now excluding game 1, is it reasonable to assume that the refs RANDOMLY satisfied both conditions (bad penalties against the Caps and bad non-calls against the Rangers) for FIVE straight games?