Friedman: - Dylan Larkin requests trade | Page 40 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Friedman: Dylan Larkin requests trade

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
Minnesota (not sure for what), Anaheim and LA all make sense as West fits

Mactavish and Zelly, Byfield as center pieces

Holland and Todd Mac would know both pieces in that hypothetical deal well
 
Not likely he goes to a team where he's the leader, and not likely Detroit gets an immediate Top 6 Center replacement for him.

So no, we probably wont know next season.

Marner is in a leadership with Vegas and this is his first season

So YES, we very much could know if it is just a cancerous organization, or cancerous player
 
Marner is in a leadership with Vegas and this is his first season

So YES, we very much could know if it is just a cancerous organization, or cancerous player

Not sure you get what I'm saying...

... It's not likely Larkin is named the captain on his new team.
 
If he's willing and with the NMC that's a key point, Anaheim could be a good fit both ways. They've got their 1C so he'd be the 2C in a greatly reduced pressure role. Going back would be McT, probably Zell, and something smaller if needed depending on Detroit's needs. That would essentially be the same salaries so easy to fit. SY and PV have a long term relationship and have made deal before so negotiations probably wouldn't be too contentious.

McT at 23 would be a great piece if Detroit wants to rebuild, and with his expected bounce back next year, could be part of the rebuild to build around.

I've said in other threads that I'd rather that the Ducks keep McT to see how well he bounces back...but for Larkin, yeah that's workable.
Detroit isn’t trading Larkin for two healthy scratches lol. McTavish could be a smaller piece if they want to move him. Zell does nothing.
 
Judging by some of the reports going 'round (I don't recall where exactly) this has been going on since approximately 2023. Dunno if he's had a trade request out that long, but I think the "let them sit" approach has already been tried.
Yeah for this to go public now we arrived at the “stomp on the neck” part of the divorce to make things move quicker
 
The point is that he has a week to make use of the 8th contract year before he is forced to trade him. Guerin will panic if he doesn't sign day one.. Quinn may even tell Bill to kick rocks if the Devils have Larkin in tow.
Why would he be forced to trade him if he doesn't sign in the first week? Yeah, there's the whole 8th contract year, but nobody is expecting him to sign for that long. If he stays, it's gonna be very likely a 3-year extension which can be agreed to any time in July or after.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bye Bye Blueston
The point is that he has a week to make use of the 8th contract year before he is forced to trade him. Guerin will panic if he doesn't sign day one.. Quinn may even tell Bill to kick rocks if the Devils have Larkin in tow.
I believe the cutoff to sign for the 8 years is in September, when the new CBA rules kick in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bye Bye Blueston

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Ad

Ad