Friedman: - Dylan Larkin requests trade | Page 175 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Friedman: Dylan Larkin requests trade

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
Eichel was on another level from Larkin when traded. ROR was a proven playoff performer and Cup winner. Larkin is in the Bo Horvat range. So his value is like what the return for Horvat was. So the return will be good enough for Yzerman to flip for what he needs.

No he wasn't? I'm talking about the ROR to St. Louis trade from Buffalo.
 
Sure, but that still doesn't mean it was never written

Time is the only true test
Yeah, a 20 year old in the KHL up 8 on 2nd place on his team in 5 fewer games was a bit of a head-turner.

I don't think you have a proper appreciation of what it takes to be in the 1C conversation for my favorite team.
 
ROR and Eichel were 27 and 25 years old when those trades happened, not 30, and they were better players than Larkin. Also, Tage Thompson and Peyton Krebs were definitely considered Beaudoin/Stramel tier prospects at the time of those trades. Nobody expected Thompson to become a 40 goal scorer.

Hertl went for a 1st and David Edstrom 2 years ago when he was the same age Larkin is now. Larkin is a little better than Hertl was but the Sharks retained salary to reduce Hertl's hit to 6.5M compared to Larkin's 8.75M. Maybe Detroit gets slightly more than the Sharks did but we should expect a package built around late 1st/Yurov/Hayton/Beaudoin/Stramel tier assets not recent top 10 picks who are tracking to be top half of the lineup NHLers.
Truly ridiculous take regarding ROR.

Won’t even touch the rest.
 
Depends on how much you value defense and not crumbling in March, I guess.
He’s good defensively. Not sure where the narrative that he’s not is coming from.

Crumbling in March - no contention there. Certainly impacts is value. Then again if he didn’t do so, we’d have been in the playoffs the last three years and we’re not having this conversations now anyways.
 
Tuch wasn't a better prospect than Yurov, the big difference is Tuch had several seasons in the league at the time of the trade, Yurov has only had one. Give him two more seasons and see where he's at. It'll be right on par with where Tuch was.

Can't say the same for Krebs and Stramel, but frankly Larkin isn't in the same tier as Eichel, and Vegas got Eichel from age 25-30, not age 30-35, so let's call it even.

Tuch had already had a 20 goal 50+ point season, a solid rookie season and was in the middle of an 18 goal in 55 games season at the time of the trade. He had almost 3 years of track record at the NHL level for teams to analyse and scout before the trade. But we're talking at the time of the trade, not just pure projection. Tuch had a much bigger track record of legit NHL play where teams were taking way less of a risk. Krebs was clearly ahead of Stramel by a lot.

And actually at the time of the trade Eichel wasn't far away from Larkin right now. He was seen as a locker room issue, he needed an experimental neck surgery that one teams doctors refused to sign off on and he was due for a huge pay day.

You can disagree with it if you want but that's all from Friedman and you know he's hearing about this stuff from people who are plugged in

Okay in that case Yurov is a better asset than Iginla from Utah, right?

Or are we gonna stop pretending we're not projecting a lot of these pieces out?
Or we can just pretend to be a little bit serious about these things. This is just a dumb argument. Of course players are being projected but Tuch vs Yurov at the time were honestly not even really close.

Yurov and Stramel aren't just a worse package than Tuch and Krebs. They're significantly worse
 
He’s good defensively. Not sure where the narrative that he’s not is coming from.

Crumbling in March - no contention there. Certainly impacts is value. Then again if he didn’t do so, we’d have been in the playoffs the last three years and we’re not having this conversations now anyways.
Good is fine. He has no top 20 Selke finishes. O'Reilly had 5 top 15 finishes before the trade to St. Louis.

O'Reilly was indisputably better.
 
Tuch had already had a 20 goal 50+ point season, a solid rookie season and was in the middle of an 18 goal in 55 games season at the time of the trade. He had almost 3 years of track record at the NHL level for teams to analyse and scout before the trade. But we're talking at the time of the trade, not just pure projection. Tuch had a much bigger track record of legit NHL play where teams were taking way less of a risk. Krebs was clearly ahead of Stramel by a lot.
This is fair. Fast forward Yurov 3 years and Detroit might have zero problem with it.

Chalk it up to bad timing.
 
That's the PTSD. Kasper went bad in year 2, so Yurov doesn't get the benefit that most young players that showed they belong in the NHL get looking forward.

Nobody in Minnesota thinks he's "special" either. But DRW fans are still underrating his potential, probably mostly for the spiteful reason of Larkin only giving 3 teams. You're naive if you don't think it plays a part it in.

Again, I don't think there's any PTSD or underrating of Yurov. (For anyone not just being intentionally ridiculous) It's just I don't see how getting another Kasper/Danielson prospect helps us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedHawkDown
It's gonna be 1st, Beaudoin and Hayton for Larkin and Cossa or something like that.

Prospects like Desnoyers, Iginla and Simashev don't get moved for 30 year old centers.
How many 29 year old 1Cs have been traded with 5 years left at a reasonable cap hit? Not sure there's any comparable trades recently to say this at all.

We do have legit NHL insiders disagreeing with you though
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad