ybnvs
Registered User
- Mar 20, 2014
- 2,186
- 3,806
I agree, it should not have happened.
Last edited by a moderator:
Ducks score an illegal goal
- Thread starter S E P H
- Start date
-
HF Sportsbook has been reset for the new season - Click here to play.
I agree, it should not have happened.
WhatTheDuck
9 - 20 - 8
dirtydanglez
Registered User
- Oct 30, 2022
- 5,208
- 5,267
play to the whistle.
they're the ducks and you're the avs. they should get a freebie and you should still win.
they're the ducks and you're the avs. they should get a freebie and you should still win.
ItWasJustified
Registered User
- Jan 1, 2015
- 4,637
- 5,849
In every sport I've played, hockey, soccer and floorball, I was taught from a young age to play until the whistle.
Dr Jan Itor
Registered User
Should've been blown dead, it wasn't. Avs definitely should've kept playing, they didn't.
Puck left the zone, no sympathy whatsoever for the goal against. This is a whiner thread of all whiner threads.
Puck left the zone, no sympathy whatsoever for the goal against. This is a whiner thread of all whiner threads.
Hot Water Bottle
Registered User
- Aug 26, 2010
- 1,534
- 28
GeeoffBrown
Registered User
- Jul 6, 2007
- 6,263
- 4,308
They installed the netting because a fan died after getting hit by a puck. If the netting was not there, the puck would've gone into the stands, so obviously out of play
The Panther
Registered User
Oh, my bad. I thought the matter was the puck's being on the net (i.e., the netting of the net).
ToDavid
Registered User
- Dec 13, 2018
- 4,168
- 5,238
It was a bad call but saying Girard had “no idea what to do” is nonsense. He stopped momentarily and then the refs very audibly told him to play on, which he did. Throwing it up the ice to no one was his own bad decision and the Avs got scored on because of a defensive breakdown, not because they believed the play was dead.
JPT
Registered User
- Jul 4, 2024
- 757
- 1,559
crump
~ ~ (ړײ) ~ ~
This is why I have no issue with players signalling to the ref when a puck goes offside, out of rink, hitting the netting etc. refs miss things.
Dotter
THE ATHLETIC IS GARBAGE
Georgiev is currently facing 25 years+ in jail in denver, however 49 other states, 9 provinces and 3 territories are fighting for him to stay free.
a mangy Meowth
Ross Colton Fan
Avs2022
Registered User
- Jan 4, 2011
- 1,005
- 1,703
I posted it earlier, but once the puck leaves the defensive zone, it's not reviewable anymore.
Wtf is that loophole to the rule?!
So Game 7 Stanley Cup Final overtime, it hits the netting and because the players didn't quit, its not reviewable?! What genius thought of that one?!
I hope they can recover from this horrible atrocity. They are the victims of an egregious act.
swiftwin
★SUMMER.OF.STEVE★
- Jul 26, 2005
- 23,997
- 13,658
This is the crime of the century for hockey:
- Illegally grabs the puck out of the air and carries it
- Tries to throw it into the net
- It doesn't even go into the net
- They call it the overtime game winning goal
I mean it's the same rules regarding offside challenging. Once it's left the zone it's considered a different play and no impact on the current goal. You have to have a limitation somewhere or else you get the other end of the issue where you could get an extended amount of time where the play continues and then something gets called back for an incident that happened 5+ minutes prior that had zero effect on a current goal.
I think the rule is pretty fair, once it comes out of the zone it gives the defending team a chance to re-establish themselves. In this situation the Avs got full possession of the puck, he had the puck on his stick for 5 full seconds before dumping it out on the glass. It was quite obvious the refs weren't stopping play by that point. When you grow up playing hockey you're taught to play until the whistle.
