I think the general consensus is if it was going to be Fowler, it would have happened by now. Doubtful it will be Leason, he's an OK 4th liner but probably not a guy for leadership role. Virtually 0 chance it'll be Tracey out Gaucher (Gaucher will still be working on establishing himself in a few years and Tracey may never make the big club).I've got four names of players who will likely wear the C if they name a captain this offseason.
MacTavish
Fowler
Terry
Leason
If they want a few years I could see
Tracey or Gaucher wearing it as well
I've got four names of players who will likely wear the C if they name a captain this offseason.
MacTavish
Fowler
Terry
Leason
If they want a few years I could see
Tracey or Gaucher wearing it as well
Give it to Zegras and be legendsfowler would've gotten the C after getzlaf retired if they saw him as captain material. the fact that he didn't says it all (thank god)
mctavish is the only guy on the team right now who i could see getting it in the future. until then, i think they'll just keep going without one. can't see gudas or killorn getting the C for a season or two
Personally I think it should be FowlerI think the general consensus is if it was going to be Fowler, it would have happened by now. Doubtful it will be Leason, he's an OK 4th liner but probably not a guy for leadership role. Virtually 0 chance it'll be Tracey out Gaucher (Gaucher will still be working on establishing himself in a few years and Tracey may never make the big club).
For older guys/stop gap captains, I think Killorn or Gudas are the ones posters have talked about. For younger guys, the Terry, McTavish, or possibly Zegras.
Terry’s exit interview quotes about leadership don’t really give me any hope for him to wear the C. If you have to read books or listen to podcasts on leadership, you aren’t the guy. Period. Especially in a room full of hockey players.
By seniority, but by his own admission Fowler isn't very vocal. Some guys can get away with it, but he doesn't seem to have the presence of guys that seemed quiet (Niedermayer). From his quote, it seems like he's much more of a 1 on 1 mentor than a group/team leader.Personally I think it should be Fowler
Personally I think it should be Fowler
I've got four names of players who will likely wear the C if they name a captain this offseason.
MacTavish
Fowler
Terry
Leason
If they want a few years I could see
Tracey or Gaucher wearing it as well
Leason? Tracey? What have I missed where they should even be in the conversation? For Tracey it doesn’t even look like he’s NHL bound at this point, let alone a captain.I've got four names of players who will likely wear the C if they name a captain this offseason.
MacTavish
Fowler
Terry
Leason
If they want a few years I could see
Tracey or Gaucher wearing it as well
Everything you described is fair for every day life, not for professional athletes.If you have to study for a test, you dont deserve to pass the test. If you try to read books to better yourself, you dont deserve to be better. If you just arent a natural born leader that does everything off of feel and instinct, you must be a bad leader and dont deserve to be a leader.
FWIW, the Boston Bruins during the Harry Sinden as coach era did not have a captain; they went with 3 Alternates (4 in one year) and Johnny Bucyk and Phil Esposito were two of them throughout. It worked pretty well; but then Bucyk and Esposito were skilled, tenured and respected players, so it's not the same as our group by ANY means. I tend to agree that in our case we need a respected player with the will and authority to take charge. Interestingly, during that era in Boston Bobby Orr never wore a letter except for an A in 1975Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
You're not giving it to him just to have somebody, that's what you're doing with 3 As. Just having somebody on the ice who can speak to the officials.
3 As has not worked. F that. I'm tired of these guys making stupid mistakes and never being accountable. Maybe when Gudas tells you to stop taking penalties in the O zone you listen. Maybe when Gudas tells you to pay attention and stop f***ing up line changes that turn into too many men penalties you listen.
Gudas was new to the team this year so I'm not saying he should have been given the C this year. But he's proven enough to me be given the job for the next two years. It's not for the next 10 years.
I like this kind of thinking and if we can land Stamkos, I think he'd be the guy.I was actually thinking this after the Kings game about Z. I'm not sure if he's ready but it would lend some weight to how tough they are on him if they see him as a future Captain or Alternate. Maybe that opens the door for someone like Stamkos to come be captain for a few years to teach the young guys to be stars for a few years while Z matures a bit more.
Well, those were some pretty talented teams and the two you mentioned were future HOFers along with that Orr guy. I'd be curious why they didn't name a captain, but as you pointed out their situation was far from ours. Maybe they had so many qualified guys they didn't want to piss anybody off by choosing one.FWIW, the Boston Bruins during the Harry Sinden as coach era did not have a captain; they went with 3 Alternates (4 in one year) and Johnny Bucyk and Phil Esposito were two of them throughout. It worked pretty well; but then Bucyk and Esposito were skilled, tenured and respected players, so it's not the same as our group by ANY means. I tend to agree that in our case we need a respected player with the will and authority to take charge. Interestingly, during that era in Boston Bobby Orr never wore a letter except for an A in 1975
I like this kind of thinking and if we can land Stamkos, I think he'd be the guy.
Everything you described is fair for every day life, not for professional athletes.