TopShelfWaterBottle
Registered
- Mar 16, 2014
- 3,434
- 1,452
Comparing who's better between chuck and hampus is pointless that's what I'm referring to. Diff positions diff needs. If we had to compare anyone on MTL with hampus it would be Weber
Proposal: Ducks - Habs
- Thread starter GhostOfWildWing
- Start date
Comparing who's better between chuck and hampus is pointless that's what I'm referring to. Diff positions diff needs. If we had to compare anyone on MTL with hampus it would be Weber
pezcore
Registered User
Would love Lindholm with the Habs but no at the cost of Patches and Chucky.
Easy no from the Habs
Easy no from the Habs
Leon Lucius Black
Registered User
- Nov 5, 2007
- 16,033
- 6,263
Pacioretty is not only a perennial 30 goal scorer, he's on a $4.5 million deal for three more years which makes his trade value even greater, especially for a budget team like Anaheim.
Kobe Armstrong
Registered User
- Jul 26, 2011
- 15,738
- 6,706
That's awful for Habs.
I love Lindholm, but we can't give 60 goals for only a combined 8M cap hit to add Lindholm. How do we replace that? This is not going to happen.
Still, Lindholm's a stud and I'd be willing for a basis of Pacioretty & him. I'm willing to lose Patche's 30g but Galchenyuk is a non-starter.
As a hockey fan, gosh I'd like to see Patche-Getzlaf-Perry as a line !
I love Lindholm, but we can't give 60 goals for only a combined 8M cap hit to add Lindholm. How do we replace that? This is not going to happen.
Still, Lindholm's a stud and I'd be willing for a basis of Pacioretty & him. I'm willing to lose Patche's 30g but Galchenyuk is a non-starter.
As a hockey fan, gosh I'd like to see Patche-Getzlaf-Perry as a line !
Pretty close to this! Im a bit hotter on Galchenyuk than Lindholm but Im not the fan on the team with Perry and Getzlaf
Even I think that Rackell is the Ducks solution for the LW spot on the 1st, I think its silly to think that his value is close of MaxPac.
Number1RedWingsFan52
Registered User
I thought Montreal needed more help in the top 6, Trading your best Center in Galchenyuk and your best LW in MaxPac and adding Rakell who's a downgrade compared to both and adding Lindhom makes zero sense You're strengthening the D here but downgrading the offense just doesn't make to much sense here. Galchenyuk will most likely get a big raise next year plus MaxPac just don't see how Anaheim can afford to add both. Plus losing Lindholm would be a downgrade for the Ducks Anaheim would be better off moving Fowler instead.
Lindholm won't be traded end of story. We have no one to replace his caliber of a player on the entire team regarding defense. Absolutely not trading Lindholm
anezthes
Registered User
- Mar 20, 2014
- 4,776
- 3,174
To everyone saying Ducks won't trade Lindholm/Rakell, I apologize my first line of the OP wasn't clear enough perhaps...while I said I fully expect both Swedes to re-sign, the entire proposal is based on GMBM getting fed up and not reaching common ground, and thus trading them as a pair.
So, please, no need for "Lindholm isn't moving" - the point of the thread is discussion.
However, seems like it does directly affect Montreal's offense too greatly and they feel the value from Ducks isn't enough...which I can see.
So, please, no need for "Lindholm isn't moving" - the point of the thread is discussion.
However, seems like it does directly affect Montreal's offense too greatly and they feel the value from Ducks isn't enough...which I can see.
Demon Wolf
Registered User
- Feb 22, 2013
- 1,040
- 1,158
Carolinas Identity*
I'm a bad troll...
CristianoRonaldo
Registered User
he is going lead you to a top 5 pick again?
Top 10 pick !
Rather get a top 10 pick than make the playoffs and lose in the first round.
jellybeans
Registered User
- Nov 9, 2007
- 1,353
- 1,139
Uhm.. No. Habs would be getting far and away the most valuable player in the deal. A #1 franchise defender under RFA control.
The difference between Galchenyuk and Rakell is nowhere near as large as you're assuming. He outscored him by 13 points while playing 10 more games last season. Most importantly, Rakell was used in a 3rd line role and barely saw any PP time. All things considered, the gap in production is hardly significant.
Brock Radunske
안양종합운동장 빙상장
- Aug 8, 2012
- 16,787
- 4,701
I hope the Ducks are buying 40 goal Patches and not that ghost I've been watching in the world cup...
What are you basing this off? Statistically he is undeniably a top-10 defender in the league already at age 22. Ducks fans who watch him every night will concur.
What are you seeing and observing that everyone else appears to be missing? Have you iso'cammed every shift of his and found a ground breaking theory for as to why he's able to put up ELITE statistics and possession metrics but remain a non-elite player? Enlighten us.
Kobe Armstrong
Registered User
- Jul 26, 2011
- 15,738
- 6,706
Pacioretty for Lindholm straight up is a deal I would definitely make though, I'm not sure how far off the value is for the Ducks. Would be great if the Ducks could add a small + somehow, though.
Radulov-Galchenyuk-Gallagher
Lehkonen-Plekanec-Shaw
Carr-DD/McCarron-Andrighetto
Danault-Mitchell-Byron
Lindholm-Weber(Captain)
Markov-Petry
Beaulieu-Pateryn/Sergachev/Redmond
would be more ideal that what we have now, if you ask me. We'd be set for the next decade with Lindholm and Sergachev, especially with Weber there to mentor them.
And for the Ducks, Pacioretty-Getzlaf-Perry would be the best line in the league. Also Pacioretty is a good leader, and signed for 3 more seasons at 4.5 a year.
Radulov-Galchenyuk-Gallagher
Lehkonen-Plekanec-Shaw
Carr-DD/McCarron-Andrighetto
Danault-Mitchell-Byron
Lindholm-Weber(Captain)
Markov-Petry
Beaulieu-Pateryn/Sergachev/Redmond
would be more ideal that what we have now, if you ask me. We'd be set for the next decade with Lindholm and Sergachev, especially with Weber there to mentor them.
And for the Ducks, Pacioretty-Getzlaf-Perry would be the best line in the league. Also Pacioretty is a good leader, and signed for 3 more seasons at 4.5 a year.
Goose of Reason
El Zilcho
- May 1, 2013
- 9,732
- 9,466
As a Duck fan that watches him every night I don't concur with that first paragraph. Hampus is very talented and has that potential but he hasn't yet played at that level consistently.
