Unpredictable1
Registered User
Beginning of 93-94 was very different team than end of that year.
Beginning had amonte, gartner, graves, messier, kovalev, tikannen, leetch, zubov, James patrick and Darren turcotte. Tons of firepower and speed for era. But by end of year half of those guys were gone and replaced by harder to play against vets - larmer, noonan Matteau, mactavish, olczyk, etc. just a very diff squad. Plus only a year or two earlier they had traded away weight for tik.
That team was a juggernaut offensively but Keenan wanted to remake the squad for the playoffs. Traded away so much skill. We likely over did it on getting rid of youth and skill for grit and as a result limited our window and wasted a bunch of richter and leetch’s prime for one shot at cup.
This team currently has similar firepower to pre-playoff push 93-94 squad, but shesty is better than Ricky (though Ricky was a make a big save when you need one type who had tons of battle). Zubov was a true x-factor as we suddenly had two high end puck movers. But bottom 6 on those squads was really skilled with tik and nemchinov. I would give 93-94 squad an edge in offensive depth but we need to see how the kids develop. So many differences in terms of eras of hockey and salary cap.
I will say, Rangers have never had a 21 year old kid who looked as dominant on the boards as Kakko since mid 80s when I started watching. Graves was closest. Kovalev was more dipsy do than bull in china shop. Kakko is one of a kind.
You really dusted off some parts of my brain with portions of this post (thank you! lol) and agree with everything.
Leetch and Zubov on the point were a cheat code of sorts.