Weird looking dude, looks like he should be in a comic or something![]()
He would be a fit well pairing with Lacombe. They will hate to go to the club with Trevor and Jamie hogging all of the attention from the ladies haha.
Last edited:
Weird looking dude, looks like he should be in a comic or something![]()
I wrote this in the prospect threadSomeone who watched the game, how did he look?
Now that Giordano & Lauzon are gone, the Kraken are down to 7 D, with Fleury being one of the cost-controlled ones. He's been playing really well for them these past few games, and I think he was always part of the long-term plan for Francis seeing as he drafted him in Carolina. That said, I wouldn't oppose bringing him back to Anaheim; I just don't see it happening.I was wondering if Seattle could go of Fleury. He and Drysdale weren't ideal but decent enough I guess.
Pretty sure he said "veteran".>"paired with a better defenceman"
...please don't ruin my fun.
To be fair, the team has only won one game with him on the roster, I definitely think it’s also more of him getting acclimated because I’ve seen potential and good play in my 3-4 viewingsSeems like he has been pretty meh.... I have watched only 1 full game since he joined the team (he was not good in it) but from his stats/team performance since they signed him.... Anyone watch any Gulls games with him and have an opinion?
Pretty funny that Zegras said he could play in the NHL![]()
I didn't really notice him negatively or positively which for a rookie defenseman in his first game against one of the best teams in the league is pretty much all you can really ask forHow was his first game?
He has potential. He was better than I expected from the reviews of him in San Diego. To be fair, most of those reviews didn't specifically reference the apparent improvement in his game over the season.
I think Hazy noted on the broadcast that Helleson said he thinks he'll be better at the NHL level because there's typically more structure and it benefits his game. I can definitely see that because his game is pretty vanilla, but honestly that's all he really needs to be, I don't think the organization or anyone is expecting him to anchor a top 4 pairing. If he just turns out to be a steady bottom 4 RHD to let one of our puck moving LHDs roam around that's all we really need IMO.
I think Hazy noted on the broadcast that Helleson said he thinks he'll be better at the NHL level because there's typically more structure and it benefits his game. I can definitely see that because his game is pretty vanilla, but honestly that's all he really needs to be, I don't think the organization or anyone is expecting him to anchor a top 4 pairing. If he just turns out to be a steady bottom 4 RHD to let one of our puck moving LHDs roam around that's all we really need IMO.